<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=239" accessDate="2026-07-10T12:48:31+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>239</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>3355</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="2953" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2806">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/91/2953/10.2307_community.12229785-1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>c30d4cdb863d67809a30b8e71ab166de</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="91">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19505">
                  <text>Women's History 2022</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19511">
                  <text>Women's History</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19512">
                  <text>Ally Green, Kelsey Parker, Paisley Hou</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19520">
                  <text>Green, Ally&#13;
Hou, Paisley&#13;
Parker, Kelsey</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20651">
                <text>Helen O. Storrow, seated, right, with three unidentified women of the World Committee.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20652">
                <text>unknown</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20653">
                <text>Storrow, Helen Osborne, 1864-1944&#13;
World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts.&#13;
Girl Scouts of the United States of America&#13;
Group portraits&#13;
Women&#13;
women&#13;
women's studies&#13;
American&#13;
photo archives&#13;
women's rights&#13;
feminism&#13;
history</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20654">
                <text>Inscription: Verso: {Mrs. Storrow as Chairman of the World Committee}, wife of Storrow, James Jackson, 1864-1926</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20655">
                <text>n.d. (circa 1928-1935)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20656">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20657">
                <text>Medium: non-projected black and white photograph&#13;
Dimensions: 8.125x10 in.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20658">
                <text>Photograph Number: MC263-147-5, Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America (Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University), Data From: The Schlesinger History of Women in America Collection, Folder Number: 147, Fo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20659">
                <text>||||osm&#13;
1928 -- 1935</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20660">
                <text>This image has been made available by the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University solely for noncommercial educational and scholarly purposes. Your use of this image is restricted to those permitted uses specified in the ARTstor Digital Library Terms and Conditions of Use (http://www.artstor.org/info/about/terms_conditions.jsp). To request permission for any other use, please contact the Schlesinger Library at slref@radcliffe.edu.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2952" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2805">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/91/2952/10.2307_community.12230886-1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>018ab95c7d04a3f5062fb18a9bb8eda9</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="91">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19505">
                  <text>Women's History 2022</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19511">
                  <text>Women's History</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19512">
                  <text>Ally Green, Kelsey Parker, Paisley Hou</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19520">
                  <text>Green, Ally&#13;
Hou, Paisley&#13;
Parker, Kelsey</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20641">
                <text>Helen O. Storrow and her dog sitting by a lake, probably Long Pond, Pine Tree Camp.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20642">
                <text>unknown</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20643">
                <text>Storrow, Helen Osborne, 1864-1944&#13;
Animals&#13;
Pets&#13;
Ponds&#13;
Women&#13;
women&#13;
women's studies&#13;
American&#13;
photo archives&#13;
women's rights&#13;
feminism&#13;
history</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20644">
                <text>Inscription: Caption: Two friends [in a different hand:] Mrs. Storrow and dog., wife of Storrow, James Jackson, 1864-1926</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20645">
                <text>n.d. (circa 1919-1928)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20646">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20647">
                <text>Medium: non-projected black and white photograph&#13;
mounted&#13;
Dimensions: 4.25x3.5 in.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20648">
                <text>Photograph Number: MC263-143-6, Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America (Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University), Data From: The Schlesinger History of Women in America Collection, Folder Number: 143, Fo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20649">
                <text>||||osm&#13;
1919 -- 1928</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20650">
                <text>This image has been made available by the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University solely for noncommercial educational and scholarly purposes. Your use of this image is restricted to those permitted uses specified in the ARTstor Digital Library Terms and Conditions of Use (http://www.artstor.org/info/about/terms_conditions.jsp). To request permission for any other use, please contact the Schlesinger Library at slref@radcliffe.edu.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2951" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2804">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/91/2951/10.2307_community.12252832-1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>7fa1a0b75bc96ddcf264802c3289991b</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="91">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19505">
                  <text>Women's History 2022</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19511">
                  <text>Women's History</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19512">
                  <text>Ally Green, Kelsey Parker, Paisley Hou</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19520">
                  <text>Green, Ally&#13;
Hou, Paisley&#13;
Parker, Kelsey</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20631">
                <text>Helen O. Storrow and a Brownie sitting on a log bench with a dog, possibly at Cedar Hill.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20632">
                <text>unknown</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20633">
                <text>Storrow, Helen Osborne, 1864-1944&#13;
Massachusetts Girl Scouts&#13;
Animals&#13;
Benches&#13;
Children&#13;
Children's clothing&#13;
Clothing and dress&#13;
Group portraits&#13;
Pets&#13;
Uniforms&#13;
Women&#13;
women&#13;
women's studies&#13;
American&#13;
photo archives&#13;
women's rights&#13;
feminism&#13;
history</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20634">
                <text>Inscription: Verso: {Storrow and Brownie at camp}, wife of Storrow, James Jackson, 1864-1926</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20635">
                <text>n.d. (circa 1917-1925)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20636">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20637">
                <text>Medium: non-projected black and white photograph&#13;
Dimensions: 8.125x10 in.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20638">
                <text>Photograph Number: MC263-147-8, Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America (Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University), Data From: The Schlesinger History of Women in America Collection, Folder Number: 147, Folder Title: Photographs: Group Photographs originally filed together with list'1 photograph HOS after receiving award of the Silver Fish; 1 photograph HOS with Chief Guide (Lady Baden-Powell) and 2 unidentified others; 1 photograph HOS with Anny Hyde Choate and dog, "Mr. Eephys"; 1 photograph HOS with Juliette Low; 1 photograph HOS as Chairman with 3 leaders on World Committee; 1 photograph HOS and others, in costume, at Morris Dance Festival, Cedar Hill (HOS as the hobbyhorse); 1 photograph HOS and ABH; 1 photograph HOS, Brownie, and dog on camp bench. Pine Tree Camp, ca. 1920, Collection Number: MC263, Collection Name: Massachusetts Girl Scouts, Collection Title: Records, 1915-1967 (inclusive)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20639">
                <text>||||osm&#13;
1917 -- 1925</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20640">
                <text>This image has been made available by the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University solely for noncommercial educational and scholarly purposes. Your use of this image is restricted to those permitted uses specified in the ARTstor Digital Library Terms and Conditions of Use (http://www.artstor.org/info/about/terms_conditions.jsp). To request permission for any other use, please contact the Schlesinger Library at slref@radcliffe.edu.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2950" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2803">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/91/2950/10.2307_community.12231707-1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>8842cbd10d6060dc521c765b25eb5d9a</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="91">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19505">
                  <text>Women's History 2022</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19511">
                  <text>Women's History</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19512">
                  <text>Ally Green, Kelsey Parker, Paisley Hou</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19520">
                  <text>Green, Ally&#13;
Hou, Paisley&#13;
Parker, Kelsey</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20622">
                <text>Helen O. Storrow, wearing a lei, with Girl Scout troops in Hawaii.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20623">
                <text>unknown</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20624">
                <text>Girl Scouts of the United States of America&#13;
Exterior views&#13;
Group portraits&#13;
Leis&#13;
School buildings&#13;
School children&#13;
Teenagers&#13;
Women&#13;
women&#13;
women's studies&#13;
American&#13;
photo archives&#13;
women's rights&#13;
feminism&#13;
history</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20625">
                <text>Inscription: [See individual photos for captions.], Inscription: Caption: Girlscouts at Ewa[?] Plantation School</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20626">
                <text>n.d. (circa 1934-1935)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20627">
                <text>image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20628">
                <text>Medium: non-projected black and white photograph&#13;
mounted&#13;
Dimensions: 6.5x4.5 in.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20629">
                <text>Mrs. Storrow's trip around the world. Australia, Hawaii [disassembled album], Photograph Number: MC263-145-7, Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America (Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University), Data From:</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20630">
                <text>This image has been made available by the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University solely for noncommercial educational and scholarly purposes. Your use of this image is restricted to those permitted uses specified in the ARTstor Digital Library Terms and Conditions of Use (http://www.artstor.org/info/about/terms_conditions.jsp). To request permission for any other use, please contact the Schlesinger Library at slref@radcliffe.edu.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2947" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2802">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/93/2947/BLM_Demands.PNG</src>
        <authentication>97c1d8868e1ed4c5effbb278056c1de6</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="93">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19517">
                  <text>California History - 2022</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19518">
                  <text>California History</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19519">
                  <text>Rania Ansari, Cooper Safon, Derek Schmitz, Jashan Kaeley, Ed Roa</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20603">
                <text>Black Lives Matter Demands</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20604">
                <text>Black Lives Matter</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20605">
                <text>Black Power</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20606">
                <text>BLM</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20607">
                <text>A list of BLM's 7 demands taken from their website. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20608">
                <text>Black Lives Matter</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20609">
                <text>2022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2946" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2801">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/93/2946/california_pic.jpg</src>
        <authentication>610b06c8866536c0f1723768e8b5a0c8</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="93">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19517">
                  <text>California History - 2022</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19518">
                  <text>California History</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19519">
                  <text>Rania Ansari, Cooper Safon, Derek Schmitz, Jashan Kaeley, Ed Roa</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20597">
                <text>California graphic print</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20598">
                <text>Schiller, David</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20599">
                <text>California</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20600">
                <text>a graphic print of the state of California</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20601">
                <text>Sparta Graphics</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20602">
                <text>1969</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2945" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3287" order="1">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/86/2945/ballila.jpg</src>
        <authentication>6b31707fc9690d530bff36bbcc0174b2</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20591">
                <text>B is for Balilla - Content</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20592">
                <text>Fascist Alphabet Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20593">
                <text>1936</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20594">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20595">
                <text>Italia All'A alla Z</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20596">
                <text>Italian</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="37172">
                <text>Fraschetti, Vincenzo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="37173">
                <text>Officine Dell'istituto Geografico De Agostini</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2944" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20577">
                <text>The Immigration Act of 1917</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20578">
                <text>United States Government</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20579">
                <text>Immigration Law</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20580">
                <text>Legal Documents</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20581">
                <text>&#13;
Presents the text of the Immigration Act of 1917, which regulated immigration of aliens to the United States. Definitions used in the Act; Prohibitions settled upon those seeking admittance; Prohibitions against indentured service.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20582">
                <text>Great Neck Publishing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20583">
                <text>EBSCO</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20584">
                <text>1917* (original)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20585">
                <text>2017–8–1* (source published online)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20586">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20587">
                <text>HTML Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20588">
                <text>https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=prh&amp;AN=21213137&amp;site=eds-live</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20589">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2943" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2799">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/90/2943/Pdhistory_source2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>65131ab1cf0ea07fb95c37ad27db3b01</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="20562">
                    <text>Exploring the Effects of U.S. Immigration Enforcement on the Well-being of Citizen
Children in Mexican Immigrant Families
Author(s): Lauren E. Gulbas and Luis H. Zayas
Source: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences , July 2017, Vol.
3, No. 4, Undocumented Immigrants and Their Experience with Illegality (July 2017),
pp. 53-69
Published by: Russell Sage Foundation
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2017.3.4.04
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2017.3.4.04?seq=1&amp;cid=pdfreference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms &amp; Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0
Unported License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

Russell Sage Foundation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Exploring the Effects of U.S.
Immigration Enforcement on
the Well-being of Citizen
Children in Mexican
Immigrant Families
l au r en e. gulba s a n d luis h. z aya s

In this article, we draw on ecocultural theories of risk and resilience to examine qualitatively the experiences
of U.S. citizen children living with their undocumented Mexican parents. Our purpose is to render visible the
various ways in which citizen children confront and navigate the possibilities—and realities—of parental
deportation. We develop a framework to conceptualize the complex multidimensional, and often multidirectional, factors experienced by citizen children vulnerable to or directly facing parental deportation. We situate youth well-being against a backdrop of multiple factors to understand how indirect and direct encounters
with immigration enforcement, the mixed-status family niche, and access to resources shape diﬀerential
child outcomes. In doing so, we oﬀer insights into how diﬀerent factors potentially contribute to resilience in
the face of adversity.
Keywords: children, citizenship, deportation, undocumented, well-being

An estimated 4.5 million U.S. citizen children
live in families in which one or both parents
are undocumented (Pew Hispanic Research
Center 2013). Researchers are just beginning to
understand the ripple eﬀects of immigration
enforcement policies on immigrant families,
and particularly on those families whose members have diﬀerent authorizations, or mixedstatus families (Dreby 2013). Given escalations
in punitive measures that target undocumented individuals in the United States (Peutz

and De Genova 2010), a growing number of
citizen children face the harsh realities associated with parental deportation: forced family
separations, material deprivation, anxiety, and
depression (Gonzales and Chavez 2012; Zayas
2015). Citizen children living in Mexican immigrant families experience a disproportionate burden of risk because the sociopolitical
practices aimed at policing migrant illegality
increasingly target those of Mexican origin
(Dreby 2012).

Lauren E. Gulbas is an anthropologist and assistant professor in the School of Social Work at the University of
Texas, Austin. Luis H. Zayas is professor, endowed chair, and dean of the School of Social Work at the University of Texas, Austin.
© 2017 Russell Sage Foundation. Gulbas, Lauren E., and Luis H. Zayas. 2017. “Exploring the Effects of U.S. Immigration Enforcement on the Well-being of Citizen Children in Mexican Immigrant Families.” RSF: The Russell
Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 3(4): 53–69. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2017.3.4.04. Support for this
research was provided by National Institute for Child Health and Human Development grant HD068874 to Luis
H. Zayas. We express our gratitude to the families who participated in this study. Direct correspondence to:
Lauren E. Gulbas at laurengulbas@austin.utexas.edu, School of Social Work, University of Texas, 1925 San
Jacinto Blvd., D3500, Austin, TX 78712; and Luis H. Zayas at lzayas@austin.utexas.edu, School of Social Work,
University of Texas, 1925 San Jacinto Blvd., D3500, Austin, TX 78712.

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�54

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

To date, research has highlighted the various ways in which immigration enforcement
practices increase the likelihood that citizen
children will experience academic challenges,
physical and mental health problems, and
cognitive and developmental delays (CavazosRehg, Zayas, and Spitznagel 2007; Kersey, Geppert, and Cutts 2007; Perreira and Ornelas
2011; Potochnik and Perreira 2010; SuárezOrozco and Yoshikawa 2013; Yoshikawa 2011;
Zayas and Bradlee 2015). Although this research has drawn much-needed attention to
the multilevel risk proﬁles of citizen children,
the predominant focus on risk has led to generalized assumptions about the vulnerability
of this population and overshadowed the
evaluation of citizen children’s strengths,
agency, and capacity (Panter-Brick 2014). This
speaks, in part, to the political nature of research on undocumented individuals and
their families. Most research, for good reason, advocates for changes to current immigration laws because studies have been able
to demonstrate the negative eﬀects such laws
have on citizen children in immigrant families. However, research that focuses attention
solely on issues of risk obscures the ways in
which citizen children actively navigate
stressful situations. Attention to processes of
resilience would oﬀer a valuable complement
to the literature.
In this article, we draw on ecocultural theories of risk and resilience to examine qualitatively the experiences of citizen children living with their undocumented Mexican parents
(Unger et al. 2013; Weisner 2010). We focus attention on how citizen children cope within
the context of current immigration enforcement and deportation policies. In doing so,
we identify factors that shape the well-being
of citizen children and highlight the contextual circumstances that have the potential to
produce variable individual outcomes. Our
paper is framed to address the following research questions: What are the eﬀects of immigration enforcement on the well-being of
citizen children? How do citizen children
cope with the fears associated with having an
undocumented parent? What strengths do citizen children draw on as they face the reali-

ties—and consequences—of parental deportation?
A N EC O C U LT U R A L P E R S P EC T I V E O N
R E S I LI E N C E I N M I X E D - S TAT U S
FA M I LI E S

Over the past decade, social scientists have
turned their attention to resilience-based research to counter the dominant focus on vulnerability, victimization, and suﬀering.
Whereas studies of risk attend to circumstances and behaviors that increase the likelihood of negative outcomes, resiliency approaches emphasize elements and processes
that sustain or promote well-being. As the anthropologist Catherine Panter-Brick notes,
studies of resilience “uncover how people manage to live their lives and make the best of dire
circumstances” (2014, 439). In such eﬀorts,
resiliency-oriented research can identify crucial leverage points that facilitate successful
coping and shape well-being.
Studies of resilience draw on a range of theoretical approaches that emphasize, to diﬀerent degrees, the salience of individual factors
and the broader context. Many social scientists
consider Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological
model to be foundational for understanding
how interactions between individuals and their
contextual environment shape childhood development (Bronfenbrenner 1979; Ungar,
Ghazinour, and Richter 2013). Bronfenbrenner
posits that proximal processes—those direct
interactions between children and their immediate social and material environments (microlevel)—are the basic elements shaping development (Bronfenbrenner and Morris 1998).
Broader ecological systems, such as the mesosystem (interaction between microsystems)
and macrosystem (broader cultural and structural context) were understood as both shaping
and being shaped by interactions in the microsystems (Bronfenbrenner 1993). In this way,
change within one system could reverberate
across systems.
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological approach has
inﬂuenced studies of risk and resilience by focusing attention to micro-, meso-, and macrolevel factors that inhibit or facilitate wellbeing (Ungar, Ghazinour, and Richter 2013).

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

Building on Bronfenbrenner’s model, anthropologists and sociologists have reconceptualized the role of culture within his ecodevelopmental framework, critiquing the
distal role that he presumed culture to play in
the lives of children and their families. As the
sociologist Jonathan Tudge argues, “what is
missing is that there is no sense . . . that cultural groups with values, beliefs, lifestyles,
and patterns of social interchange diﬀerent
from those found in North American middleclass communities would necessarily value different types of proximal processes” (2008, 72–
73). Eco- developmental approaches have
drawn little attention to the signiﬁcant ways
in which cultural processes directly shape
childhood experiences and outcomes. Such a
limitation is particularly relevant for studies
of citizen children, whose experiences are invariably aﬀected by macro-level contexts that
mandate discrepant treatment and access to
resources based on ethnicity and citizenship
status.
In light of this, our paper adopts an ecocultural approach that prioritizes attention to culture, or the everyday activities, routines, and
behaviors that children enact within their surrounding environment (Super and Harkness
1986; Trudge 2008; Weisner 2010; Worthman
2010). Ecocultural theory emphasizes the importance of family practices and strategies
that families pursue to facilitate child development and well-being (Weisner 2002). As the
anthropologist Thomas Weisner notes, families everywhere need to construct and sustain
family practices that foster survival, create
meaning, and ensure positive outcomes for
their children (2010). Yet not all family practices are equally eﬀective or achievable. Even
though families actively construct practices,
features in the surrounding environment are
also an inﬂuence. These inﬂuences include
material and institutional resources, health
and safety characteristics of the home and
community environment, expectations about
the division of household and economic labor,
informal and formal systems of support, and
sources of cultural inﬂuence. Accordingly,
family practices reﬂect a negotiation between
opportunities and constraints in the sur-

55

rounding environment and the cultural scripts
that families draw on to organize and give
meaning to everyday life and promote childhood well-being. The nexus of culture, environmental factors, and everyday family life is
constituted in the family niche (Weisner 2002,
2010). We extend an ecocultural conceptualization of the family niche to highlight the unique
circumstances facing mixed-status families. A
mixed-status family niche reﬂects both the
micro-environment families create as they balance their needs and the daily challenges associated with having an undocumented family
member.
Crucial to understanding the mixed-status
family niche is what we call a “cultural script
of silence.” As Genevieve Negrón- Gonzales
notes, “silence is a fundamental part of the
undocumented experience in this country . . .
[because] the potential consequences of discovery are so severe” (2014, 271). Drawing on
the notion of a cultural script of silence, we
analyze the ways in which citizen children interpret, manage, and navigate everyday life.
Citizen children’s daily lives are organized
around the very real possibility that their undocumented parents could one day be detained and deported. In this context, developmental tasks take on new meaning when a
knock on the family’s door has the potential
to signal a shift in the safety and integrity of
the family and the beginning of a terrifying
ordeal of parental detention and deportation.
Our purpose is to render visible the various
ways in which citizen children confront and
navigate the possibilities—and realities—of
parental deportation, in order to identify factors that potentially contribute to resilience in
the face of adversity. In doing so, we highlight
those factors that potentially distinguish citizen children from their peers in citizen families.
METHODS

Data analyzed were drawn from a mixedmethod, multisited binational study that
examined the psychosocial functioning of citizen children with undocumented Mexican
parents. Study sites included Austin, Texas;
Sacramento, California; and several locations

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�56

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Citizen Children in Study Sample

Accompanied
Parent to Mexico
(n = 31)

Characteristic

M (SD)

Age

n
(percent)

11.1 (1.9)

Living in United
States with
Undocumented
Parent
(n = 34)

Remained in
United States
(n = 18)

M (SD)

n
(percent)

11.7 (1.8)

M (SD)

n
(percent)

11.6 (1.9)

Total
(n = 83)

M (SD)

n
(percent)

11.4 (1.9)

Gender (girl)

19 (61.3)

11 (61.1)

20 (58.8)

50 (60.2)

School enrollment (yes)

30 (96.8)

18 (100)

34 (100)

82 (98.8)

Living arrangement
Both parents
One parent
No parent

20 (64.5)
10 (32.3)
1 (3.2)

10 (55.6)
8 (44.4)
0 (0.0)

26 (76.5)
7 (20.6)
1 (2.9)

56 (67.5)
25 (30.1)
2 (2.4)

Source: Authors’ compilation.

throughout Mexico (Distrito Federal, Hidalgo,
Michoacán, Oaxaca, and Sinaloa). The sampling strategy entailed recruitment of three
groups of U.S. citizen children between eight
and fourteen years old with at least one undocumented Mexican parent: those who had
accompanied their deported parents to Mexico; who stayed in the United States with a parent or guardian after one or both parents underwent deportation proceedings, had been
deported to Mexico, or returned to the United
States following deportation to Mexico; and
whose undocumented parents had never been
detained by immigration enforcement. Potential participants were excluded if they did not
fall within the targeted age range or were living
in foster care or child welfare at the time of the
study. Additional exclusionary criteria included
a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder or cognitive
or developmental disability because these
present unique challenges that might shape
the well-being of citizen children.
Recruitment was carried out with the help
of staﬀ at local community agencies at each
site. After identifying potential participants
who met criteria for participation, agency staﬀ
discussed the study with parents. Parents who
expressed interest were referred to the research
team. All parents and children provided consent and assent for their participation, and in-

stitutional review board approval was granted
at each of the institutions and sites where research activities took place.
Participants

Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of citizen children recruited for participation. Of the total eighty-three participants,
thirty-one accompanied their deported parent
or parents to Mexico, eighteen remained in the
United States after their parent or parents were
deported, and thirty-four were not directly affected by deportation at the time of the interview. Across participant subgroups, the majority were girls (60.2 percent). Nearly all
participants were enrolled in school and living
with both parents at the time interview.
Data Collection

In-depth interviews were conducted with citizen children to elicit their narratives about living with parents who were undocumented,
and, when applicable, to gather detailed accounts of their perceptions and experiences
with immigration enforcement and parental
deportation. All interviewers were bilingual,
and the majority were Mexican or Mexican
American women pursuing graduate degrees
in the social sciences and trained to conduct
qualitative interviews with children. Each in-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

terviewer conducted the interview in the language the participant preferred; approximately
42 percent of the interviews were in Spanish.
To help reduce interviewer bias across multiple research sites, the research team constructed a semistructured interview guide to
provide a series of probes and prompts to facilitate deeper exploration of topics. Questions
were open-ended to capture how citizen children communicated, gave meaning to, and
constructed their experiences and perceptions
(Ochs and Capps 1996). The interview was conducted in a way that simulated a casual and
everyday conversation; to faciliate rapport, interviewers encouraged children to ask questions and provide feedback about the interview
process. Interviews began with a “grand tour”
question to explore participants’ perceptions
about home and family life, including descriptions of family activities and relationships, the
child’s roles and responsibilities within the
family, and social life outside the home (Spradley 1979). These questions set the stage for a
discussion about direct and indirect experiences with immigration enforcement or parental deportation. Interviewers focused on eliciting what the child remembered as meaningful,
placing particular emphasis on having children describe their perceptions, thoughts,
emotions, feelings, reﬂections, and interpretations to ascertain the psychosocial impact of
parental removal or having an undocumented
parent. If applicable, children were asked to
reﬂect on how their life had changed as a result
of the deportation.
Throughout qualitative data collection, several procedures were followed to monitor and
enhance the data quality. All interviews were
digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed
in the language of the interview to enhance
validity (Guest and MacQueen 2008). Interview
transcripts and notes were systematically reviewed, and a series of debrieﬁng meetings
were held with research team members to discuss the rigors of the data collection process
(Mack, Bunce, and Akumatey 2008).
Data Analysis

Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic approach to identify and describe participant perspectives (Guest, MacQueen, and Namey 2012).

57

To develop the coding framework, the ﬁrst author and a graduate research assistant independently read two interviews, recording their
initial interpretations of text. Emergent themes
were discussed in a team meeting, and a draft
of a codebook was developed from this discussion. Additional interviews were read to test
the utility of preliminary themes, with attention directed toward the emergence of new
themes. After eight interviews had been read,
themes in the codebook appeared to be well
established and a ﬁnal draft of the codebook
was produced. To test the utility of the codebook and establish intercoder reliability, four
interviews were uploaded into NVivo9, independently coded by the ﬁrst author and the
research assistant, and percent agreement was
calculated using the coding comparison module. Text that fell below a 75 percent threshold
was discussed during a team meeting, and the
codebook was revised as necessary (Miles and
Huberman 1994). Interviews were subsequently
coded using NVivo9, ﬁrst by the research assistant, and then by the ﬁrst author. This approach facilitated the transparency of the coders’ interpretations of the data by reviewing
and monitoring all coded text.
After data coding was completed, a framework matrix was generated in NVivo9. A framework matrix organizes data by themes (columns) and participants (rows). Each cell of the
matrix contained reduced data in the form of
direct quotes and summarized information
about the manifestation of a given theme in a
particular case. The matrix was then exported
and converted to a text document that contained the reduced and summarized information pertaining to each speciﬁc participant, or
case.
To protect against bias in the interpretation
of the cases, a panel of thirteen experts reviewed the data to compare the experiences of
citizen children across cognitive, emotional,
psychological, cultural, and socioeconomic dimensions. The panel included clinical psychologists and social workers in Mexico and the
United States, each of whom had expertise in
the mental health and cultural issues that Latino youth and their families experience. Each
panelist evaluated a random selection of
twenty cases to ensure that each case was re-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�58

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

Figure 1. Framework for Understanding Effects of Immigration Enforcement on Citizen Child
Outcomes
The Political Economy of U.S. Immigration Policy
Distribution of Resources (for example, housing, employment, schooling, physical
and mental healthcare, immigration resources, social support, community solidarity)

Mixed-Status Family Niche
Parent Characteristics

Immigration
Enforcement
Fear ● Arrest ● Detention
Deportation ● Separation
Relocation

Family Characteristics
• Structure
• Family roles and expectations
• Dynamics and relationships

• Personal roles and expectations
• Internal/psychological resources
• Gender
• Substance abuse, trauma
• Education, language
• Legal status

Cultural Script of Silence
• Communication
• Stressors
• Legal status
• Family and cultural history

Citizen Child Characteristics
• Personal roles and expectations
• Internal/psychological resources
• Gender, age, developmental level
• Substance abuse, trauma
• Education, language
• Legal status

Child Outcomes
Negative . . . . . . . . . . Positive

• Mental, emotional status
• Levels of stress
• Social/material well-being
• Sense of identity, belonging
• Academic performance

Source: Authors’ compilation.

viewed by multiple panelists. The panelists
were brought together, by telephone in Mexico
and in person in the United States, to discuss
the results of their analysis. Their discussions
were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to develop a list of all the issues that citizen children
face and the contextual factors that exacerbated or ameliorated their direct and indirect
experiences with immigration enforcement.
The list originally contained 339 items, which
were organized into sixty-one categories, each
of which was linked to the interview data by
annotating which cases corresponded to a
given category. The research team then reviewed and discussed the arrangement of
items and speciﬁcation of categories and revised them accordingly. The list of categories
was ﬁnalized by consensus and a framework
developed to capture the diﬀerential eﬀects of
immigration enforcement on the well-being
of citizen children. The framework was revised
and ﬁnalized through an iterative team process
(see Sobo 2009).
R E S U LT S

In ﬁgure 1, we oﬀer a framework to describe
the varied circumstances facing citizen children to conceptualize the range of eﬀects immigration policies have on the well-being of

U.S. citizen children. Figure 1 illustrates the
interrelationships among ﬁve categories that
emerged as salient to the perspectives of citizen children: immigration enforcement, the
cultural script of silence, the distribution of
resources, the mixed-status family niche, and
child outcomes. Variations in child outcomes,
as experienced and narrated by citizen children, depended strongly on the particular processes and characteristics in place within speciﬁc contexts. We begin with a description of
the script of silence, followed by an exploration
of the ways in which citizen children drew on
the cultural script of silence to navigate the
various personal, social, and material ecologies
that characterized their lives in their eﬀorts to
cope with and adapt to situations beyond their
control. To contextualize the framework, we
present accounts of U.S. citizen children, in
their own words. All names are pseudonyms.
T H E C U LT U R A L S C R I P T O F S I LE N C E

As illustrated in ﬁgure 1, the cultural script of
silence emerges within a speciﬁc context: the
enforcement of U.S. immigration policies.
Given the potential for an act of immigration
enforcement to rupture family ties, most children perceived encounters with immigration
enforcement as the worst event that could be-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

fall a family. Encounters could be indirect—
through the potential threat of parental deportation or knowing others who had been
deported—or direct—through the arrest, detention, and deportation of a parent. The condition of illegality, which rendered a parent’s
deportation possible, created and maintained
a context ripe for the development of a cultural
script of silence. Nearly every citizen child in
our study described the salience of silence
within their families. We call this phenomenon
the cultural script of silence, referencing a shared
script, or code, held among family members
that prohibited the discussion of legal status
both within and outside the household. The
script of silence shaped parents’ interactions
with their children and what they told their children about immigration, citizenship, and undocumented status. The script not only guided
the ways in which parents and children interacted, but also informed how parents taught or
modeled behaviors, and the ways in which parents communicated and provided support.
The importance of silence was ﬁrst learned
indirectly. As ﬁftteen-year-old Tommy, whose
father had been detained, explained, “I guess
it wasn’t really that I found out [about my parents’ status]. It was more like, like an idea you
settle into, and that you think is normal. And
like all the fears they have, you start to have,
too.” Like Tommy, most participants in our
sample stated that their parents rarely discussed the realities associated with being undocumented, though many children referenced an embodied comprehension of their
parents’ undocumented status as a result of
the various ways in which illegality organized
dynamics within the mixed-status family. Children came to know deﬁnitively about their parents’ status only through a speciﬁc event that
forced parents to explain. For example, when
one participant, Marianela, was eight years old,
she learned that both her parents were undocumented when her father became severely ill.
As she recalled the moment, “I told my mom
that we should take him to the hospital to see
what is going on with him. . . . And that’s when
my mom told me that we can’t take him to the
hospital. And that’s when I said, ‘He’s sick. We
need to take him to the hospital.’ And my mom
told me that my dad didn’t have any papers.”

59

Once citizen children learned that their parents were undocumented, they became keenly
aware of the ways in which a cultural script of
silence delineated family expectations for children’s interactions outside of the home. For
example, Tommy explained that his parents
provided him with explicit instructions to
monitor his behavior in public: “Whenever we
were around important people, you know like,
those people who deport other people, I have
to behave very well.”
In other families, citizen children were
strongly encouraged to remain silent about
their parents’ undocumented status. As nineyear-old Catarina explained, “Because my mom
doesn’t want me to tell anyone she says that
she could get in trouble if I talk to people about
it.” To be sure, participants were aware of the
pragmatic necessity for silence to protect their
parents from detection by immigration enforcement agencies. For example, fourteenyear-old Jessica recounted a time when her
friend’s mother had been deported after being
reported to legal authorities: “It happened to
my friend. That’s the only reason why her mom
went to Mexico. Because her neighbors
snitched them out that her mom didn’t have
papers. I worry if I tell someone, the same
thing is gonna happen as it happened to her.”
Despite the pragmatic need for discretion,
the script of silence contributed to experiences
of powerlessness among citizen children.
As Tommy explained, “we can’t really say our
mind or protest because we might get taken.
We have to, like, stay to the laws a lot more
than other people. Because they’ll judge us on
our skin and say, ‘Oh, you’re Mexican. Go to
your side.’”
In its most extreme manifestation, the cultural script of silence could set into motion a
series of emotional or family dynamics that
negatively aﬀected the well-being of citizen
children. The cultural script of silence shaped
children’s cognitive and emotional expression,
and some participants described conscious efforts to “not think” about their parents’ situation. Maya, nine years old, put it this way: “I
really don’t think about that. I just think fun
things.” For many participants, the potential
for a direct encounter with law enforcement
produced considerable fear, worry, and stress.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�60

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

For example, Maria, a ten-year-old who lived
with her undocumented parents and younger
citizen brother, explained, “I have papers, and
they don’t. They can’t really go places. They
could go to prison.” This awareness led to extreme fear of police oﬃcers. When Maria saw
a police car near her house, she would run inside, close the curtains, and cry profusely. It
was not until the police left the vicinity that
Maria would realize her parents were safe, and
only then would she come out of hiding. Her
fear of law enforcement stemmed from the
very real possibility that “maybe one day, they
can just take them. And then, me and my little
brother would have to go to foster homes. I
really don’t want that.”
Deliberate eﬀorts to silence thoughts and
emotions prevented children from having a
space, either with family or friends, to process
their fears, anxieties, and worries. The importance of silence within families sometimes
acted to weaken supportive bonds between
parents and children, and participants reported becoming distrustful of their parents
as a result. As eleven-year-old Anthony noted,
“They’re lying and all that. Like they knew they
did not have papers, but they didn’t tell me.”
Surprisingly, silence often continued even
after families experienced the worst possible
circumstance: the arrest, detention, and deportation of a parent. Children who experienced parental detention or deportation explained that they knew very little about the
immigration proceedings that led to the deportation of their parents. For example, Anthony did not understand why his father
“went” to Mexico. Although his father had
been deported eight months prior to the interview, he reported that he knew “only that
my dad was going to Mexico. [My mom] didn’t
want to talk about it.” Similarly, for elevenyear-old Ernesto, the events resulting in his
father’s deportation were unclear. Ernesto explained that he woke up one day to learn that
his father had been “taken” to Mexico. As he
described it, “I just woke up and asked mom
what happened. And she said they took him
back to Mexico. He was somewhere, and they
sent him to Mexico. I think he did something
bad . . . I don’t know.”
Some participants could vividly recall the

circumstances surrounding parental deportation because they witnessed directly the arrest
and detention of their undocumented parent.
For example, Christina was twelve years old
when her mother was arrested. According to
Christina, who was fourteen at the time of the
interview, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrived at Christina’s house
early one morning:
Like ﬁve in the morning. They just came . . .
knocking on the door. And like, my mom, she
was really scared. And my dad was like, “pack
your stuﬀ! And let’s leave.” And [my mom]
looked outside the window, and the house
was surrounded. It was surrounded by like
ICE people. And I heard, like, loud knocking.
And like, I just got up . . . and I was like,
“what’s going on?” Because there were, like,
a lot of people on the porch. Everywhere. I
was, like, super scared . . . . And like, they
took her. And she gave me the last hug, and
um . . . She walked out of the door. And I was
like, “You can’t leave us!” [Christina’s voice
cracks, and she starts to cry quietly] So . . .
me seeing my mom go away, it was very hard
for me.

Christina recounted how she retreated into
herself following her mother’s arrest. As she
explained, “I quit my grades, and with, like,
everything.” Christina’s eventual healing occurred only after she found a space to vocalize
her experience. Still, when Christina reﬂected
on that horrible night, she actively wished that
she could erase, not only her mother’s arrest,
but also her presence during it: “If I could
change anything in my life, I would probably
change that. I would wish not to be there whenever they took my mom. I wish I would never
see that.”
Not a single participant in our study described having a plan in place that would help
guide and assist children about what to do in
the event that a parent was arrested and detained. In this way, the cultural script of silence
seemed to thwart the implementation of emergency plans for children and their families. As
a result, participants described intense emotional experiences during the arrest and detention of a parent, and in turn, active eﬀorts to

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

mute the painful memories associated with
such experiences. For example, thirteen-yearold Guillermo described the arrest and detention of his father this way: “Like sometimes it
comes to my mind, but mostly I don’t think
about that. I don’t know. When I’m about to
go to sleep, it just comes up.” The middles of
the night, when he would wake from nightmares about his father, were some of the bleakest times for Guillermo.
It is important that the cultural script of silence was not static or unchanging in its manifestation. The salience of the script, both in
guiding family dynamics and the extent to
which it aﬀected the well-being of citizen children, depended on the quality of resources
available to children and their families. Although the script of silence operated as a kind
of mediating force that shaped speciﬁc patterns of emotions, thoughts, behaviors, and
dynamics within the mixed-status family, the
well-being of citizen children was more than
the simple presence or absence of a cultural
script. Rather, well-being was also shaped by
the availability and distribution of and access
to social and material resources.
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES

All of the participants in our study came to
feel, experience, and understand the sociopolitical condition of illegality via their encounters with public institutions and broader community settings. Health care, employment,
housing, neighborhood violence, and discrimination emerged as salient nodes around
which citizen children came to understand the
meaning of their parents’ undocumented status, the political and economic constraints associated with lack of citizenship, and their
own location within the constellation of discourses surrounding perceptions of individuals deemed illegal. The political and economic
consequences of illegality reverberated across
families of mixed-status through everyday
experiences. Varied assemblages of legal statuses within and across families—citizen,
authorized, undocumented—shaped the everyday experiences of citizen children diﬀerently, and the distribution of resources was
often the driving force behind these diﬀerential experiences. As ﬁgure 1 illustrates, access

61

to ﬁnancial, education, extracurricular, mental
health, legal, and immigration-related resources often translated to the diﬀerences
between suﬀering, on the one hand, and resiliency, on the other.
In mixed-status families with one authorized or citizen parent, citizen children described less acute ﬁnancial and housing struggles. In this way, legal status operated as a
deﬁnitive resource. Nevertheless, the condition
of illegality reverberated across the household
even when only one parent was undocumented.
In these cases, issues related to the institutional invisibility of the undocumented parent
loomed large. For example, Cecilia, the tenyear-old daughter of an undocumented mother
and citizen father, recounted that “the school
doesn’t know my mom’s name. She can’t sign
our paperwork, and they only see my dad.” Her
mother’s undocumented status altered the domestic organization of responsibilities within
the household, and her father was charged
with acting as both mother and father in the
public sphere.
Among citizen children whose parents were
detained, chronic experiences of political and
economic marginalization sometimes shaped
family decisions to accept deportation. In the
case of Jennyfer, a fourteen-year-old who lived
with her undocumented grandmother and undocumented mother, her mother became
gravely ill. Her mother had been diagnosed
with hepatitis C, which Jennyfer thought had
been the result of a blood transfusion her
mother received during childbirth. The family
considered returning to Mexico to enable her
mother to receive health care, but soon after
this discussion, Jennyfer’s grandmother was
arrested and detained. Given the status of the
mother’s health, the grandmother accepted deportation so that the mother could receive the
care she needed in Mexico. Although Jennyfer
felt “sad” to leave the United States, she noted,
“I would prefer that we moved here so that my
mother could get better rather than stay there
and watch her get worse.” For Jennyfer and her
family, barriers to accessing health care inﬂuenced the conditions under which they would
“accept” deportation. In the end, Jennifyer decided that she would do whatever it would take
to stay close to her mother.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�62

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

Many participants who relocated to Mexico
to reunite with their deported parents described how they initially missed the conveniences and material abundance associated
with life in the United States, such as shopping
at big box stores. However, these experiences
gave way to more profound sensations of loss
about their potential futures and resources. As
twelve-year-old Clarissa explained, “If I stay
here [in Mexico] I won’t have the chance to
have any kind of future.” Participants described Mexico as a place with limited educational and employment opportunity. Twelveyear- old Luciana narrated a particularly
diﬃcult adjustment to the school setting in
Mexico. She described repeatedly asking for
help in her studies, but her teachers did not
respond to her requests. They would tell her
they were “too bored” by her questions. As a
result, she lost any desire to do well in school:
“I see that my grades have dropped a lot because I’m like, why would I try if no matter
what I do, the teachers aren’t even going to notice?”
Cases such as these reveal the various ways
in which access to resources might have contributed to diﬀerent outcomes for children in
our study. Although legal status excluded many
families from accessing resources, such as safe
employment and healthcare, key players within
institutional and family settings ﬁgured prominently in facilitating participants’ access to
what limited resources were available. For example, soon after the arrest and detention of
Christina’s mother, described above, her father
was detained and deported. Although her
mother was eventually released, Christina and
her siblings experienced major disruptions in
terms of housing and access to material resources. Desolate, Christina broke the script of
silence and reached out to her school counselor: “I told my counselor that we really
needed help ’cause, like, it was more than ten
people living at my aunt’s house. And she
didn’t have enough money for us. So [my counselor] got most of the teachers, they donated
food and clothes. I remember coming home
from school with a lot of bags full of like food
and diapers and other stuﬀ.” For Christina and
members of her family, the school staﬀ provided material resources needed to sustain

family life. Moreover, the counselor created a
supportive environment for Christina to process her emotional reactions to her father’s deportation.
For other citizen children, extended kin
emerged as key brokers to accessing resources.
Karla, twelve years old, described the signiﬁcance of extended kin in shaping her experience of reuniting with her family in Mexico
following her father’s deportation. Her grandfather helped ease the transition economically
by providing Karla’s family with a house in
Mexico and giving her father a job working in
his painting business. On occasion, Karla’s
grandfather would supplement the family’s income when they needed the extra money. With
this additional money, Karla was able to maintain her involvement in sports, which helped
to provide continuity between her former life
in the United States and her new life in Mexico.
Karla had participated in club boxing in the
United States and was able to join a boxing
gym in Mexico. During the interview, Karla
noted excitedly that she was anticipating her
ﬁrst boxing match. She had been training for
“a long, long time. They put me up against a
ninth grader, and I am barely in sixth grade.
But she’s tiny! And I’ve been training for this
. . . for the day that I’ll ﬁght.”
The cases of Christina and Karla reveal how
access to resources was shaped by relationships between citizen children and other individuals within their social network. In this way,
social support functioned as a critical resource,
particularly when trusted family and friends
constructed a space to dismantle the cultural
script of silence. Fourteen-year-old Elena, for
example, described how she became withdrawn and uncommunicative on learning that
her father had been detained. In response, her
mother reached out to her and enrolled her in
dance class to provide an outlet for her “frustration.” In this way, Elena’s mother provided
support by ﬁnding a space in which Elena
could process her emotions. In addition to
family, trusted peers operated as a strong system of social support, buﬀering against the
trauma associated with immigration enforcement by breaching the script of silence. Elena
described school as a kind of second family:
“We all know each other. We’ve been knowing

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

each other since ﬁfth grade. So we already have
really strong connections because we’ve been
growing and our school, they’re like, team and
family. So all of us are like our family.” Close
friendships at school created spaces of perceived safety in which citizen children could
divulge their worst fears, worries, and anxieties. As Elena noted,
There is this girl. She is my best friend, and
we have known each other since the second
grade. And I know that her parents don’t
have any papers too, so I mostly tell her everything about my life. Because, um, she told
me everything about her life, and how she
feels scared that she could lose her parents
if they are ever sent to Mexico. So we tell each
other everything, and we try to help each
other out.

School enabled citizen children like Elena
to foster relationships based on their shared
experiences. Moreover, the school administration facilitated classroom curricula designed
to break the script of silence and raise awareness about immigration:
See, in our school, like in our history class
they teach us about diﬀerent topics and one
of the topics has been, um, immigration. We
can connect a lot to that since our school is
99.9 percent Hispanics. We already know
most of the things so sometimes, like sometimes, it’s an emotional class where we stay
strong. So, it’s kind of good to know something else that could help you.

Unfortunately, Elena’s experience was rare.
Her story reveals the ways in which her links
to institutional resources and supportive relationships contributed to her well-being during
her father’s detention. Yet, the constellation of
individual and family characteristics within
her mixed-status family niche also facilitated
positive outcomes as well. For example, Elena’s
parents had divorced many years before her
father was detained. Although her family often
spent time together in activities that included
both her parents, such as family dinner, Elena
did not live with her father. This is not to say
that the detention of Elena’s father was no less

63

distressing to her, but rather that her wellbeing was shaped by the complex interaction
of various factors, including those within the
mixed-status family niche.
T H E M I X E D - S TAT U S FA M I LY N I C H E

Figure 1 illustrates the elements that make up
the micro-setting of daily life in mixed-status
families, or the mixed-status family niche. The
niche represents the dynamic interplay between characteristics and behaviors at the individual and family level. Parent characteristics
and family cohesion were cited as key to the
capacity for the family to act as a system of social support and foster well-being.
Participants noted that their well-being was
deeply tied to their parents’ vulnerabilities and
strengths, and thus that parental well-being
held the potential to be a source of comfort or
of stress for citizen children. Among participants, family histories of substance abuse or
trauma were perceived as particularly stressful,
capable of exacerbating the negative eﬀects of
immigration enforcement experiences. For example, Marisa, a thirteen-year-old who had reunited with her parents in Mexico after their
deportation, noted that her father’s history of
substance abuse overshadowed her own adjustment to living in a new environment.
Marisa had hoped that in reuniting with her
parents in Mexico she would recover the parental love and support that she needed and
desired. Yet, her relationship with her father
was strained, and she described him as distant
and uncommunicative. As she explained,
“With my father taking drugs, he can’t work
and he spends a lot [on drugs]. And my mom
has to work to be able to keep up the house.
He has promised us so many times, he has
sworn to us, that he is going to quit, but he
never does. Sometimes he just spends the day
in the house sleeping.”
In reuniting with her family in Mexico,
Marisa was forced to renegotiate her expectations for parental care. Her father’s substance
abuse aﬀected his capacity to act as an engaged
father and family member, but also produced
ﬁnancial strain. In turn, Marissa’s mother
worked extended hours and was rarely home.
Marissa noted that the family did not agree
about the reorganization of family life in Mex-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�64

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

ico, which generated signiﬁcant family conﬂict.
In contrast, personal strengths were perceived as diminishing the negative eﬀects or
stressors that stemmed from immigration enforcement. For example, Marco, a fourteenyear-old boy, described the importance of a
strong work ethic, which was instilled in him
by his father. He noted that his father “wants
to teach me how to work so I can get our family a better future. I work. I ﬁnd anything I can
do. I help my mom.” Marco’s narrative reﬂected the way in which he was becoming socialized to become the patriarch of the family,
a process that had been accelerated by the fact
that his father was facing deportation. Marco
sometimes struggled with his newfound responsibilities but nevertheless accepted them.
He explained:
I don’t really have my childhood anymore. I
don’t get to play around anymore. I always
have to be there. I have to be strong for my
brothers. I guess I miss when I was smaller
and everything being so innocent for me. The
world just being there as a playground for
me. A place for me to have fun. Now it’s kind
of more like a . . . How would you call it?
Um . . . obstacle ground. With obstacles. Obstacles I have to go through. I don’t like it,
but there’s nothing I can do to take it oﬀ of
me. I have to be there. It’s my responsibility,
and I have to hold it up, and I have to be
there.

For Marco, like many citizen children, age
and gender shaped the ways that parents organized household roles and responsibilities.
The eﬀects of immigration policies and practices often made it diﬃcult for families to build
consistent routines for children, which frequently resulted in confusion or resentment
about their roles and responsibilities within
the household. This was particularly the case
among older girls who reunited with their families in Mexico. For example, in the case of
ﬁfteen-year-old Melina, she felt that the task of
sibling and domestic care detracted from her
personal motivation to focus on her education.
Both her parents were required to work long

hours outside of the household, and they
charged Melina with caring for the household.
As she explained, “[In the United States], I
didn’t have to clean, or work in the kitchen, or
anything. It was pure studying because that is
what I spent my time doing. But here, no, here
it is diﬀerent. Here, you spend all your time
cleaning the house, taking care of your siblings. Now it’s no longer about studying.”
Reﬂecting on the change in routines in Mexico, Melina noted that she felt resentful toward
her new responsibilities in the household. She
said that she often took it out on her younger
siblings by ignoring them. As her case illustrates, the ways that participants interpreted
sudden changes in their routines and responsibilities could produce resentment, frustration, and angst, particularly when new household practices were perceived as thwarting
their individual expectations and needs. In
contrast, older boys and younger girls in our
sample sometimes embraced the opportunity
to contribute to the household. Thus, consensus among family members regarding the gendered and age-based organization of household responsibilities contributed to supportive
interactions, whereas conﬂict between personal and family expectations could lead to
tension. Individual characteristics and behaviors of children and parents were perceived as
shaping the quality of family dynamics, yet
many participants were cognizant of the ways
in which family dynamics were singularly constrained by the broader political economy of
U.S. immigration policy. This recognition led
numerous citizen children to declare, “Things
would be better in my family if only my parents
had papers.”
C H I LD O U TC O M E S

Figure 1 illustrates how, within the context of
the political economy of U.S. immigration policy and encounters with enforcement agencies,
the distribution of resources, the arrangement
of factors in the mixed-status family niche, and
the cultural script of silence interact to shape
outcomes for citizen children. A range of effects on well-being is suggested, from negative
to positive in terms of social and material wellbeing, the mental and emotional status of chil-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

dren, levels of stress, sense of identity and belonging, and academic performance. In this
regard, an important theme in our research is
that no single and deﬁnitive proﬁle encapsulates the experiences of citizen children in
mixed-status families. As illustrated in ﬁgure
1, the eﬀects of immigration encounters on the
well-being of citizen children depend heavily
on many factors, reﬂecting the combined and
continued eﬀects associated with the political
economy of U.S. immigration policy, the resources available to children and their families, the organization of the mixed-status family niche, and the cultural scripts that
individuals draw on to navigate daily life.
Across participants, well-being was experienced diﬀerently depending on family circumstances. Without legal status, wage earners
were subject to the realities of participating in
an unskilled and informal labor market. As a
result, most youth hoped their parents could
get papers one day so that they would be able
to ﬁnd more satisfying—and better paying—
work. As Jose, thirteen years old, noted, if his
parents had papers, “they could be here and
be comfortable. I just know that my dad says
that he wants the papers because he wants a
better job.”
Additionally, some participants described
confusion about their national, ethnic, and legal identities. Having an undocumented parent imposed boundaries of exclusion within
school and community settings, even among
those who had never experienced parental deportation. For example, twelve-year-old Anna
recalled, “a lot of people are very racist at my
school. And a lot of them say, ‘Go back where
you came from.’” Experiences of discrimination had a disempowering eﬀect on children’s
understandings of their social location within
these broader settings. As fourteen-year-old
David explained, “I don’t feel like other kids in
school. I feel kind of like an outlaw.” For youth
who experienced parental deportation, some
participants described not knowing where they
belonged. Ten-year-old Daniel, who accompanied his deported father to Mexico, described
“being between two worlds. I have family here
and family over there, in both places. I’m like
in the middle of Mexico and the U.S.”

65

The potential threats to well-being could
bring heightened stress and emotional and
mental distress. Fear and worries about their
parents’ status, or experiences of parental deportation, made it diﬃcult for youth to engage
actively in daily life. One eleven year old,
Emma, recounted that every time she left her
mother’s side, even at school, she became increasingly nervous that something would happen to her mother and she would not be nearby
to help: “It’s just worrying. Like [if I] leave her
side. Like not be there to support her.” In another case, Manny, who was fourteen years old,
began to experience intense headaches and
nausea when his father was deported to Mexico. At the time, he was living with his mother,
a U.S. citizen, and younger brother. As he described the experience, “It was nerves. Pure
nerves. I was scared that something would happen to my mom. Like, someone would hurt her
or kidnap her, or something like that, because
my dad wasn’t there.” As time passed, his
symptoms worsened, and he began to vomit at
school, almost daily. In response, the school
sent him home because, as he said, “I couldn’t
be without my mom. It scared me.” Finally, his
mother took him to a psychologist, who recommended that the family reunite for Manny’s
emotional well-being. The family heeded the
psychologist’s advice and moved to Mexico to
rejoin Manny’s father, whereupon Manny’s
symptoms disappeared.
In our sample, Manny was not alone in his
experience of intense distress. Nearly 30 percent of participants in the study described
symptoms often associated with anxiety and
depression, including intense bouts of crying,
loss of interest in activities, diﬃculties sleeping, loss of appetite, feelings of fear, and suicidal thoughts. Although intense suﬀering was
experienced across our sample, citizen children
who were in the midst of parental deportation
processes reported suﬀering more frequently
than children in other groups. Among children
who accompanied their deported parents to
Mexico, the majority described diﬃculties adjusting to the diﬀerent ecocultural environment, and these diﬃculties could be experienced more intensely depending on the
constellation of factors outlined in ﬁgure 1.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�66

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

Such experiences were not universal, however, as described in many of the cases, and
some citizen children exhibited extraordinary
resilience in the face of the many adversities
they confronted. Unfortunately, narratives of
well-being were described with less frequency
across all groups. This was especially so among
citizen children experiencing parental separation due to detention and deportation at the
time of the interview: no child in this group
reported doing well. In comparison, only seven
citizen children whose parents had never been
deported and only six who accompanied their
parents to Mexico described feeling safe, emotionally secure, and socially connected. Among
these children, access to resources to nurture
well-being appeared to be a key leverage point
in shaping how participants were able to manage their everyday lives. The most fundamental
resource, at least from the perspective of citizen children across groups, was family cohesion. As Karla eloquently described it after her
family reuniﬁcation in Mexico,
Really, I am happy there [in the United
States], and I am happy here [in Mexico]. I am
happy as long as I have my parents with me.
If I am separated from one of them, I don’t
know what to do. It hurts. I can’t be as happy
as I would if I lived with both of them. I have
always lived with both of them.
DISCUSSION

In this paper, we describe a framework for conceptualizing the eﬀects of immigration enforcement on the well-being of citizen children
living with their undocumented Mexican parents. The framework illustrates the complex
multidimensional, and often multidirectional,
factors citizen children vulnerable to or directly facing parental deportation experience.
Our ﬁndings suggest that the everyday realities
facing citizen children—and the ways in which
these realities shape well-being—cannot be reduced to simple explanations. Thus, we situate
youth well-being against a backdrop of multiple factors to understand how indirect and direct encounters with immigration enforcement, the mixed-status family niche, and
access to resources shape diﬀerential child outcomes.

Participants in our study described wellbeing in terms of a dynamic relationship between personal qualities and the social context
surrounding them. In this conﬁguration, the
presence or absence of parents emerged as a
signiﬁcant theme. Forced family separations
were perceived to be the worst stressor facing
participants in our sample. Among citizen
children without experiences of parental deportation, the potential for a forced separation
was never far from their minds. Indeed, the
“deportability” of their parents was described
overwhelmingly as a major cause for emotional distress (De Genova 2002). For citizen
children facing parental deportation, families
were forced to confront whether they should
separate so that children could remain in their
citizen country or relocate to Mexico to keep
the family together. In deciding, citizen children had to evaluate the potential emotional,
social, and material costs, and brace themselves for the aftermath.
The adverse circumstances citizen children
faced were not limited to forced family separations and reﬂected the broader consequences
associated with the political economy of U.S.
immigration policy. Participants described the
varied ﬁnancial and emotional costs associated
with illegality, supporting research that describes the ways in which citizen children suffer the consequences of their parents’ undocumented status (Chavez et al. 1997; Guendelman
et al. 2006; Kersey, Geppert, and Cutts 2007;
Perreira and Ornelas 2011). Our results reveal
how the personal strengths of parents and children had the potential to shield children from
the negative eﬀects of stressors that stemmed
from indirect and direct encounters with immigration enforcement. Strengths were often
entwined with the availability of resources that
could enhance well-being. Access to ﬁnancial,
educational, extracurricular, mental health, legal, and immigration-related resources buttressed individual strengths and buﬀered
against traumatic experiences related to immigration enforcement and forced family separations. Extended kin and individuals in school
and religious institutions emerged as supportive networks that facilitated access to those resources that were important to well-being. Social connection, however, was not without its

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t

risks.1 A strong social network was key to the
facilitation of well-being among citizen children, but its loss could exacerbate the emotional costs of relocation to Mexico after parental deportation.
In our ﬁndings, we point to the cultural
script of silence as an additional risk factor
that is unique to the experience of mixedstatus families. The presence and pragmatics
of cultural silence have been well documented
among families and communities of undocumented individuals (De Genova 2002, 2009;
Fassin 2001; Menjívar and Kanstroom, 2014).
Yet, as Joanna Dreby convincingly argues, U.S.
immigration policies have “a profound impact
on children in Mexican families regardless of
the parents’ or children’s legal status or the
family’s actual involvement with the Department of Homeland Security” (2012, 843). The
consequences of illegality, and the cultural logics of silence, extend beyond the boundaries
of legal status to aﬀect the lives of citizen children as well (Zayas 2015; Zayas and Bradlee
2015), and our ﬁndings point to the diﬀerent
ways in which silence operates. Although all
participants knew that their parents were undocumented, the cultural script of silence
manifested through other processes that encouraged youth to be silent about their experiences of suﬀering with kin, their peers, and
even themselves.2 Arguably, silencing not only
leads to emotional and mental distress, but
also fractures citizen children’s understanding
of their place in the world (Fivush 2010). Without a community to safely break the code of
silence, citizen children—and their undocumented peers—must risk the potential integrity of their families should they choose to
voice their experiences. It is for this reason that
any resistance to the cultural script of silence
will be found in the most closed, trusted, and
intimate spaces. The experiences of immigrant
families will remain, for the most part, hidden,
camouﬂaged, and unspoken. Continued re-

67

search on the eﬀects of silence on well-being
is warranted, especially comparative research
that examines the diﬀerential experiences of
citizen children and the spectrums of silence.
The categories and factors illustrated in ﬁgure 1 are derived from a rigorous approach to
qualitative data analysis. Nevertheless, additional research is warranted to test our model
and to determine the extent to which certain
factors aﬀect citizen children in immigrant
families of diﬀerent national origin. Additionally, we did not examine the unique circumstances of children living with psychiatric, cognitive, or developmental disability. Living with
disability poses unique opportunities and challenges for families, which might distinguish
their experiences as citizen children living in
mixed-status families (Farrell and Krahn 2014).
Research is still needed that examines the intersections of disability and legal status. Our
framework opens the door for a critical discussion of the diﬀerent factors that aﬀect citizen
children, and it is our hope that subsequent
revisions are made to the framework based on
the results of additional research. Of particular
importance is the need to investigate how resources available in citizen children’s local environment shape the degree to which cultural
scripts, such as the script for silence, and individual coping mechanisms become helpful
or harmful.
Our ﬁndings provide opportunities to inﬂuence immigration enforcement policies and
practices. Experiences of family cohesion and
dissolution hold particular relevance for this
population, signifying potential avenues to reorganize programs and policies to enhance the
well-being of citizen children. For example, the
signiﬁcance of the theme of family separation
suggests the need to reconsider detention procedures that thwart family togetherness. Current practices that detain parents in locations
that are geographically distant from family
households pose serious risks to the emotional

1. Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for the suggestion regarding this point.
2. Our participants were aware of their parents’ legal status, and this distinguishes our results from other research that reveals that many children, especially those who are undocumented, remain unaware of their families’ legal status until they attend college (Gonzales 2011). This points to the diversity of experiences within
immigrant families, both in terms of how children become aware of legal status differences and the experiences
that such knowledge engenders.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�68

undocumen ted immigr a n ts a nd their ex perience w ith illega lit y

well-being of citizen children (Zayas 2015). In
the end, our results point to many resources
that were perceived as mattering most. It is our
hope, in oﬀering a comprehensive account of
the eﬀects of immigration enforcement, that
the framework can be used to modify leverage
points that oﬀer the potential for change in
micro and macro settings in ways that appreciate the diversity of citizen children’s experiences.

Farrell, Anne F., and Gloria L. Krahn. 2014. “Family
Life Goes On: Disability in Contemporary Families.” Family Relations 63(1): 1–6.
Fassin, Didier. 2001. “The Biopolitics of Otherness:
Undocumented Foreigners and Racial Discrimination in French Public Debate.” Anthropology
Today 17(1): 3–7.
Fivush, Robyn. 2010. “Speaking Silence: The Social
Construction of Silence in Autobiographical and
Cultural Narratives.” Memory 18(2): 88–98.
Gonzales, Roberto G. 2011. “Learning to Be Illegal:

R E FE R E N C E S

Undocumented Youth and Shifting Legal Con-

Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. Ecology of Human Devel-

texts in the Transition to Adulthood.” American

opment: Experiments by Nature and Design.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
———. 1993. “The Ecology of Cognitive Development: Research Models and Fugitive Findings.”
In Development in Context: Acting and Thinking

Sociological Review 76(1): 602–19.
Gonzales, Roberto G., and Leo R. Chavez. 2012.
“Awakening to a Nightmare.” Current Anthropology 53(3): 255–81.
Guendelman, Sylvia, Megan Wier, Veronica Angulo,

in Speciﬁc Environments, edited by Robert H.

and Doug Oman. 2006. “The Effects of Child-

Wozniak and Kurt W. Fisher. Hillsdale, N.J.: Law-

Only Insurance Coverage and Family Coverage

rence Erlbaum.

on Health Care Access and Use: Recent Findings

Bronfenbrenner, Urie, and Pamela A. Morris. 1998.
“The Ecology of Developmental Process.” In
Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Mod-

Among Low-Income Children in California.”
Health Services Research 41(1): 125–47.
Guest, Greg, and Kathleen M MacQueen. 2008. “Re-

els of Human Development, edited by William

evaluating Guidelines in Qualitative Research.” In

Damon and Richard M. Lerner. New York: John

Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research,

Wiley &amp; Sons.

edited by Greg Guest and Kathleen M. Mac-

Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A., Luis H. Zayas, and Edward L. Spitznagel. 2007. “Legal Status, Emotional Well-being and Subjective Health Status
of Latino Immigrants.” Journal of the National
Medical Association 99(10): 1126–31.
Chavez, Leo R., F. Allan Hubbell, Shiraz I. Mishra,
and R. Burciaga Valdez. 1997. “Undocumented
Latina Immigrants in Orange County, California:
A Comparative Analysis.” International Migration
Review 31(1): 88–107.
De Genova, Nicholas, P. 2002. “Migrant ‘Illegality’
and Deportability in Everyday Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (October): 419–47.
———. 2009. “Conﬂicts of Mobility, and the Mobility

Queen. New York: Altamira.
Guest, Greg, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E.
Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Kersey, Margaret, Joni Geppert, and Diana B. Cutts.
2007. “Hunger in Young Children of Mexican Immigrant Families.” Public Health Nutrition 10(4):
390–95.
Mack, Natasha, Arwen Bunce, and Betty Akumatey.
2008. “A Logistical Framework for Enhancing
Team Dynamics.” In Handbook for Team-Based
Qualitative Research, edited by Greg Guest and
Kathleen M. MacQueen. New York: Altamira.
Menjívar, Cecilia, and Daniel Kanstroom. 2013. Con-

of Conﬂict: Rightlessness, Presence, Subjectivity,

structing Immigrant ‘Illegality’: Critiques, Experi-

Freedom.” Subjectivity 29(1): 445–66.

ences, and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge

Dreby, Joanna. 2012. “The Burden of Deportation on
Children in Mexican Immigrant Families.” Journal
of Marriage and Family 74(4): 829–45.
———. 2013. “The Ripple Effects of Deportation Poli-

University Press.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994.
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source
Book. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

cies on Mexican Women and Their Children.” In

Negrón-Gonzales, Genevieve. 2014. “Undocumented,

The Other People: Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Unafraid and Unapologetic: Re-Articulatory Prac-

on Migration, edited by Meg Wilkes Karraker.

tices and Migrant Youth ‘Illegality’.” Latino Stud-

New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

ies 12(2): 259–78.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he effects of immigr at ion en forcemen t
Ochs, Elinor, and Lisa Capps. 1996. “Narrating the

Developmental Niche: A Conceptualization at the

Self.” Annual Review of Anthropology 25 (Octo-

Interface of Child and Culture.” International

ber): 19–43.

Journal of Behavioral Development 9(4): 545–

Panter-Brick, Catherine. 2014. “Health, Risk, and Re-

69

69.

silience: Interdisciplinary Concepts and Applica-

Tudge, Jonathan. 2008. The Everyday Lives of Young

tions.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43 (Octo-

Children: Culture, Class, and Child Rearing In Di-

ber): 431–48.

verse Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-

Perreira, Krista M., and India J. Ornelas. 2011. “The
Physical and Psychological Well-being of Immi-

sity Press.
Ungar, Michael, Mehdi Ghazinour, and Jörg Richter.

grant Children.” Future of Children 21(1): 195–

2013. “Annual Research Review: What Is Resil-

218.

ience Within the Social Ecology of Human Devel-

Peutz, Nathalie, and Nicholas De Genova. 2010. “Introduction.” In The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement, edited by Nicholas De Genova and Nathalie Peutz.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pew Hispanic Research Center. 2013. “A Nation of

opment?” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 5(4): 348–66.
Weisner, Thomas S. 2002. “Ecocultural Understanding of Children’s Developmental Pathways.” Human Development 45(4): 275–81.
———. 2010. “Well-being, Chaos and Culture: Sus-

Immigrants: A Portrait of the 40 Million, Includ-

taining a Meaningful Daily Routine.” In Chaos

ing 11 Million Unauthorized.” Washington, D.C.:

and Its Inﬂuence on Children’s Development, ed-

Pew Research Center. Accessed March 1, 2017.

ited by Gary W. Evans and Theodore D. Wachs.

http://www.pewhispanic.org/ﬁles/2013/01/

Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Asso-

statistical_portrait_ﬁnal_jan_29.pdf.
Potochnick, Stephanie R., and Krista M. Perreira.

ciation.
Worthman, Carol. 2010. “Survival and Health.” In

2010. “Depression and Anxiety Among First-

Handbook of Cultural Developmental Science, ed-

Generation Immigrant Latino Youth: Key Corre-

ited by Marc H. Bornstein. New York: Taylor and

lates and Implications for Future Research.” The
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 198(7):

Francis.
Yoshikawa, Hirokazu. 2011. Immigrants Raising Citizens: Undocumented Parents and Their Children.

470–77.
Sobo, Elisa J. 2009. Culture and Meaning in Health
Services Research: A Practical Field Guide. Walnut Creek, Calif.: Left Coast Press.
Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview.
New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Suárez-Orozco, Carola, and Hirokazu Yoshikawa.

New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Zayas, Luis. 2015. Forgotten Citizens: Deportation,
Children, and the Making of American Exiles and
Orphans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zayas, Luis H., and Mollie H. Bradlee. 2015. “Children of Undocumented Immigrants: Imperiled

2013. “Undocumented Status: Implications for

Developmental Trajectories.” In Race, Ethnicity

Child Development, Policy, and Ethical Re-

and Self: Identity in Multicultural Perspective, ed-

search.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent

ited by Elizabeth P. Salett and Diane R. Koslow.

Development 2013(141): 61–78.

Washington, D.C.: National Association of Social

Super, Charles M., and Sara Harkness. 1986. “The

Workers.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:05:16 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20563">
                <text>Exploring the Effects of U.S. Immigration Enforcement on the Well-being of Citizen Children in Mexican Immigrant Families</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20564">
                <text>Gulbas, Lauren, E</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20565">
                <text>Zayas, Luis, H</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20566">
                <text>Mexican Immigration</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20567">
                <text>Health and Well-Being</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20568">
                <text>Immigration Enforcement</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20569">
                <text>In this article, we draw on ecocultural theories of risk and resilience to examine qualitatively the experiences of U.S. citizen children living with their undocumented Mexican parents. Our purpose is to render visible the various ways in which citizen children confront and navigate the possibilities—and realities—of parental deportation. We develop a framework to conceptualize the complex multidimensional, and often multidirectional, factors experienced by citizen children vulnerable to or directly facing parental deportation. We situate youth well-being against a backdrop of multiple factors to understand how indirect and direct encounters with immigration enforcement, the mixed-status family niche, and access to resources shape differential child outcomes. In doing so, we offer insights into how different factors potentially contribute to resilience in the face of adversity.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20570">
                <text>The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20571">
                <text>2017–7</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20572">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20573">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20574">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20575">
                <text>https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2017.3.4.04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20576">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2942" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2798">
        <src>https://dh.scu.edu/exhibits/files/original/90/2942/PDhistory_source_.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1b3660953b85febfc4233d111060c80c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="20547">
                    <text>The Racialization of Latino Immigrants in New Destinations: Criminality, Ascription,
and Countermobilization
Author(s): Hana E. Brown, Jennifer A. Jones and Andrea Becker
Source: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences , August 2018,
Vol. 4, No. 5, Immigration and Changing Identities (August 2018), pp. 118-140
Published by: Russell Sage Foundation
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/10.7758/rsf.2018.4.5.06
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.com/stable/10.7758/rsf.2018.4.5.06?seq=1&amp;cid=pdfreference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms &amp; Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0
Unported License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

Russell Sage Foundation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�The Racialization of Latino
Immigrants in New
Destinations: Criminality,
Ascription, and
Countermobilization
H a na E. Brow n, Jen n ifer A. Jon es, a n d A n dr e a Beck er
This article analyzes patterns in Latino immigrant racialization in the U.S. South. Drawing on a unique
dataset of more than 4,200 news stories from the region, we find that Latino immigrants face multifaceted
racialization in the news media and that this racialization shares substantive similarities with African
American racialization processes. The most dominant negative characterizations of Mexican and Latino immigrants focus on their perceived criminal tendencies. Claims of Latino criminality apply implicitly coded
racial language about black criminality to new Latino arrivals. A close qualitative analysis of these trends
reveals an ongoing cycle of racialization in which immigration foes challenge Latino or Mexican immigrants
as criminal elements and immigration advocates respond with charges of racism and discrimination. Supplemental analyses from four African American newspapers suggest that black elites perceive Latinos as
sharing a common experience of racial discrimination at the hands of whites.
Keywords: race, immigration, South, Latinos, criminalization, racialization

Due in large part to immigration, the Latino
share of the U.S. population has increased dramatically in recent years. Latinos now make up
16 percent of the U.S. population, accounting
for half of the nation’s growth demographic in

the past decade (Passel, Cohn, and Lopez 2011).
By 2050, demographers project that the Latino
population will have doubled to more than one
hundred million (Krogstad 2015). Thanks to
these transformations, a vigorous debate has

Hana E. Brown is associate professor of sociology at Wake Forest University. Jennifer A. Jones is assistant
professor of sociology at the University of Notre Dame. Andrea Becker is a PhD student in sociology at Vanderbilt University.
© 2018 Russell Sage Foundation. Brown, Hana E., Jennifer A. Jones, and Andrea Becker. 2018. “The Racialization
of Latino Immigrants in New Destinations: Criminality, Ascription, and Countermobilization.” RSF: The Russell
Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 4(5): 118–40. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.5.06. The authors would
like to thank Felicia Arriaga, Ann Hollingsworth, Christina Lawrence, Robert Reece, and Nura Sediqe for their
research assistance. Funding for this research was provided by a Russell Sage Presidential Authority Award
(#88-­14-­05) and grants from the National Science Foundation (SES-­1728780), University of Notre Dame, and
Wake Forest University. The first two authors are equal co-­authors, listed in alphabetical order. Direct correspondence to: Hana E. Brown at brownhe@wfu.edu, Department of Sociology, Wake Forest University, Box 7808,
1834 Wake Forest Rd., Winston-­Salem, NC 27109; Jennifer A. Jones at jjones23@nd.edu, Department of Sociology, University of Notre Dame, 749 Flanner Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556; and Andrea Becker at andrea.beccker
@vanderbilt.edu, Department of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351811, Nashville, TN 37235.
Open Access Policy: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences is an open access journal.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-­NonCommercial-­NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

emerged about the role that Latino immigrants
occupy in the U.S. racial hierarchy (Bonilla-­Silva
2004; Chavez 2008; Lee and Bean 2004). Will
Latinos join African Americans as collective minorities? Are they assimilating into whiteness?
Or will Latinos occupy a distinctive racial position between whites and African Americans?
These questions have taken on particular importance in the U.S. South, a region long characterized by stark black-­white divisions and
now home to the fastest growth Latino population in the nation (Kochhar, Suro, and Tafoya
2005).
Most work on these questions draws either
from large-­scale analyses of survey data (Frank,
Akresh, and Lu 2010; Golash-­Boza 2006) or on
qualitative case studies focused on a single locale (Marrow 2011; Ribas 2015). Recognizing
that the media are a critical site of racial formation (Omi and Winant 1994) and an important
aspect of the context of reception (Menjívar
2016), we analyze patterns in Latino immigrant
racialization in Southern news coverage. Our
analyses of immigrant racialization draw from
a unique dataset of more than 4,200 news stories from 2003 to 2013 from eight newspapers
across four new destination states: Alabama,
Georgia, Mississippi, and North Carolina.
Results indicate that Latino immigrants face
multifaceted racialization in the news media
and that this racialization is, in key ways, consistent in substance and form with that faced
by African Americans. Rather than focus on immigrants as economic threats, the most dominant negative characterizations of Mexican immigrants and of Central and South American
immigrants focus on their perceived criminal
tendencies. Moreover, claims of Latino criminality apply implicitly coded racial language
about black criminality to new Latino arrivals
(Alexander 2012; Mendelberg 2001). Our results
further suggest that pro-­immigration forces
also racialize Latinos, albeit differently. Despite
much evidence that immigrants use economic
arguments to make claims for various rights
(Deckard and Browne 2016), we find that an
equally if not more common argument made
to defend Latino immigrants in Southern newspapers is that they face racism and discrimination. The writers, editorial board members, and

119

political figures making these arguments routinely draw parallels between immigration enforcement efforts and the South’s historic commitment to racial inequality, Jim Crow, and
segregation. A close qualitative analysis of
these trends reveals an ongoing cycle of racialization in which immigration foes challenge
Latino or Mexican immigrants as criminal elements, and immigration advocates respond
with charges of racism and discrimination.
Supplemental analyses of 476 news stories from
the largest African American newspapers in
these states reveal that these newspapers portray immigrants much more positively than
mainstream newspapers do. Our results further
suggest that African American political and cultural elites perceive Latinos as sharing a common experience of racial discrimination at the
hands of whites.
These findings suggest that, at this historical juncture, Latinos are not uniformly assimilating into whiteness. Rather, in key ways, Latinos in the South face racialization as collective
minorities. Our results also suggest a need for
renewed attention to the role that the social
distinctions of place play in shaping ideas
about race. Moreover, they indicate that making sense of the racially transformative effects
of immigration requires a nuanced understanding of the racialization process. Existing
research largely emphasizes explicit micro patterns of immigrant racial self-­identification
and macro patterns of state ascription (but see
Mora 2014). Although important, this focus neglects the effects that pro-­immigration forces,
meso-­level organizations, and implicit racial
appeals have on immigrants’ place in and adjustment to U.S. race relations and racial hierarchies.
R aci a li z at i o n , I m m i g r at i o n , a n d
N e w I m m i g r a n t D e s t i n at i o n s

Over the course of U.S. history, racial dynamics
and immigration trends have been closely intertwined (Calavita 2007; Lee 2002; Molina
2013). Immigration patterns not only affect individual and collective self-­identification, they
influence intergroup relations, racial hierarchies, and racialized public policies (Lee and
Bean 2004, 2012). Contemporary questions

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�120

Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

about Latino racialization emerge from this
broader entanglement of racial formation processes and immigration trends and settlement
patterns.1
To assess the effect of immigration on racial
formation requires a foundational recognition
of the socially constructed nature of racial categories and groups. Racial meanings vary from
society to society as well as overtime within a
particular geographic and social context. These
shifts arise in part due to racialization processes that make racial distinctions and schemas “common sense—a way of comprehending, explaining, and acting in the world” (Omi
and Winant 1994, 60). Racialization, in Frantz
Fanon’s formulation of the term, referred to
colonialism’s erasure of intragroup differences
and its imposition of racial categories onto previously distinct groups (2004). Today, racialization “signals the processes by which ideas
about race are constructed, come to be regarded as meaningful, and are acted upon”
(Murji and Solomos 2005, 1).
Race and stratification scholars generally
concur that racialization involves the mutually
constitutive processes of ascription and identification (Brodkin 1998; Brown and Jones 2015;
Nobles 2000). Ascription involves the application of arbitrary and usually phenotypic characteristics to lump together individuals into a
meaningful social category. This process creates a common sense assumption of shared
characteristics used to legitimate specific patterns of resource allocation and exploitation
(Lacayo 2017). The identificational element of
racialization involves acceptance of this designation, often for mobilization or identity construction (Espiritu 1993; Okamoto and Mora
2014; Omi and Winant 1994).
U.S. research on racialization has focused
heavily on black-­white racial dynamics, but racial formation involves groups such as Latinos
as well. Since at least the mid-­nineteenth century, Latino racialization patterns have shifted
in response to political, legal, and demographic
actions (Jimenez 2009; Mora 2014; Oboler 1995;
Portes and Rumbaut 2001; Rodriguez 2000;

Rumbaut 2011; Sommers 1991). The 1848 Treaty
of Guadalupe Hidalgo classified Mexican-­origin
people as legally white regardless of ancestry.
However, this classification did not translate
into social acceptance as whites (Gutiérrez
1995; Haney-­Lopez 1997; Montejano 1987). As a
result, the first half of the twentieth century
involved constant social and political negotiations over the racial status of Latin American
and Caribbean origin individuals. Latin American and Caribbean origin peoples in the
United States found themselves alternately subject to Jim Crow, segregation, and exclusion on
the one hand, and the beneficiaries of resource
access and protections not afforded to African
Americans and Asian Americans on the other,
depending on origin, phenotype, and location
of settlement (FitzGerald and Cook-­Martin
2014; Hattam 2007; Ngai 2005). The racial positioning of Mexican Americans in particular varied by geography, by time period, and even by
institutional setting (Fox and Guglielmo 2012).
After the passage of the 1965 Immigration
Act, migration from Latin American countries
swelled, and Latino identity and racialization
took on new political significance. Motivated
in part by a desire to eliminate legalized racial
discrimination in both civil rights and immigration law, the law shifted the allocation of
visas. With few visas available to immigrants
from the Western hemisphere, Latinos, especially Mexicans and Central Americans, became
further connected in the collective imaginary
to “illegal” or undocumented immigration. In
the 1990s and 2000s, various geopolitical and
economic shifts such as the North American
Free Trade Agreement set off unprecedented
migration flows, marking an explosive period
of Latino population growth in the United
States that was compounded by high fertility
rates among U.S.-­based Latinos (Massey, Durand, and Malone 2003).
This period also witnessed a fundamental
shift in the settlement patterns of Latino in­
dividuals in the United States. Thanks to new
economic opportunities and heightened immigration enforcement in some traditional des-

1. Whether Latinos constitute a race is much debated. We argue that Latinos experience racializing processes
that homogenize a diverse population, institutionalize categories in a status hierarchy, and unevenly distribute
resources along those lines (Browne and Odem 2012, 322).
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

tinations, Latino immigrants began settling in
large numbers in small towns and suburbs
across the nation (Massey 2008; Singer, Hardwick, and Brettell 2008). Southeastern states
such as Georgia and North Carolina saw massive increases in their Latino and foreign-­born
populations and now rank in the top ten in
terms of states with the highest population of
unauthorized immigrants (Massey 2008; Singer
2004; Singer, Hardwick, and Brettell 2008).
These demographic transformations raise old
questions about Latino racialization but in a
new context—the U.S. South. Given that racial
dynamics in the South have largely revolved
around black-­white relations and inequalities,
what position do Latinos occupy in the region’s
racial landscape? Some hypothesize that Latinos will join African Americans as collective
minorities (Jones 2012; Smith 2014). Others
highlight the possibility that Latinos will assimilate into whiteness (Alba 2016; Alba and
Islam 2009; Gans 2017; but see Vargas 2015) or
occupy a distinctive and possibly elevated racial
position between whites and blacks (Bonilla-­
Silva 2004; Frank, Akresh, and Lu 2010; Gans
1999; Alba and Islam 2009; Lee and Bean 2004;
Marrow 2011).
To address this question, a collection of
pathbreaking researchers have examined emergent racial dynamics on the ground in new immigrant destinations like the U.S. South. Focused largely on the early 2000s or periods
prior, these studies present evidence of black-­
brown tensions, conflict, and distancing. Although both blacks and whites at the time perceived Latinos as outsiders, African Americans
did so thanks in part to perceptions of resource
competition and long histories of interracial
hostility and resource competition (LeDuff
2000; Marrow 2011; Ribas 2015; Rich and Miranda 2005; Stuesse 2009). These results provide empirical support for the view that Latinos
occupy a racial middle. However, this interpretation depends on whether distancing is understood as a short-­term mobility strategy used
by immigrants throughout history to avoid association with blacks or a more lasting trian-

121

gulated position in which Latinos are neither
accepted by whites nor demoted to collective
blacks (Kim 1999; Roediger 2006). Further,
shifts in immigration enforcement priorities
and racial politics in the mid-­2000s may have
altered Latino racial incorporation trajectories
since these earlier studies were conducted
(Jones 2012; Marrow 2017; Williams 2016). Indeed, in the South today, traditional indicators
of racial incorporation, such as intermarriage
rates and residential segregation patterns,
show clear similarities between blacks and Latinos, suggesting possible shifts in racialization
processes on the ground in recent years (Frey
2015; Lofquist et al. 2012).2
Existing studies on these questions draw
largely on in-­depth ethnographic research that
provides a nuanced and powerful picture of
emergent race relations in individual communities. Although these are essential contributions to our understanding of the racializing
facets of immigration, the emphasis on individual community relations offers limited insights into the broader context in which the
dynamics of racialization and intergroup re­
lations occur, suggesting a need for cross-­
regional work. Moreover, because few of these
studies account for cultural and institutional
discourses, further work is required to understand the broader practices that drive ascriptive racialization and the location of Latinos
in the racial hierarchy (Chavez 2008; Chavez
2012; Mora 2014; Santa Ana 2002). This gap in
the research is consequential not only because
ascription is an essential component of racialization, but also because it plays an important
role in shaping race relations and social policy
(Browne, Deckard, and Rodriguez 2016; McConnell 2011).
Because the news media are an important
part of the context of reception (Menjívar 2016),
media analysis provides a useful opportunity
to address these gaps. As Eileen McConnell
notes, the mass media actively construct metaphors, ideologies, and beliefs about nonwhites
in the United States, often emphasizing a narrow range of negative topics that link racial mi-

2. Out-­marriage rates for blacks and Latinos are similarly low in the four states under study here (Lofquist et al.
2012). Hispanic and black residential segregation rates are also similar, with Hispanic-­white segregation indices
revealing increasing segregation in recent years (Frey 2015).
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

122

norities with social problems (2011). This focus
shapes public perceptions of nonwhites as racialized nuisances and social threats. News media shape both conscious and unconscious biases about immigrants and racial minorities
(Haney-­Lopez 1997; Kaufmann 2003). For example, the media have powerfully shaped popular understandings of African Americans, portraying them as dangerous outsiders, predators,
and public menaces. These portrayals occur at
rates that are disproportionate to the actual
crime rate among African Americans, arise in
both fictional and nonfictional contexts, and
perpetuate stereotypes of pervasive criminality
and social threat (Chiricos and Eschholz 2002;
Dixon and Linz 2000b; Smiley and Fakunle
2016). The media in traditional immigrant destinations have also constructed Latinos and immigrants as existential threats to U.S. culture
and the nation-­state (Chavez 2008; De Genova
and Ramos-­Zayas 2003; McConnell 2011; Rodriguez 2000; Santa Ana 2002). Such representations characterize Latinos as unassimilable,
foreign, and an economic threat.
These media characterizations are not mere
expressions of grievances. They shape the ideologies and social understandings of local residents toward racial groups and toward immigration (Brown 2013; Domke 2000; Flores 2003;
Hopkins 2010). Because the media construct
and disseminate cultural frames that give
meaning to critical issues, they play a crucial
role in the racialization process and in immigration politics (Gilens 1999; Menjívar 2016; Rodriguez 2018). They also shape the attitudes of
bureaucrats, and policymakers who shape opportunities and access for these groups, closing
off opportunities for incorporation and upward
mobility (Dunaway, Branton, and Abrajano
2010; Sohoni and Mendez 2014). Examining
newspaper coverage in Oregon, José Padín argues that news media play a critical role in
shaping what he calls the “climate of new immigrant reception,” asserting that the media
frames Latinos relationally, positioning them
according to a set of normative racialized codes

that are used to distinguish or establish similarities to other groups (2005). Such processes
are deeply implicated in the construction of
local racial hierarchies and in the identity formation of Latinos, who may decide to contest
or accept this new set of ascriptive meanings
and definitions assigned to them (Dávila 2012;
Mora 2014).
Data a n d M e t h o d s

To assess Latino racialization in new destinations, we conducted a news media content analysis of more than 4,200 news stories from 2003
to 2013 from eight newspapers across the
South. The use of newspapers to analyze public
discourse is a long-­standing trend in the social
sciences. In recent years, newspaper circulation
has decreased, suggesting that newspaper
framing may have less public impact than previously. That said, ample evidence suggests that
that declining print subscriptions are counterbalanced by increases in online subscriptions
and readership (Mitchell and Rosenstiel 2012).
Studies also reveal that the content and framing of mainstream print, online, and social media news sources are relatively similar (Janssen
2010; O’Neill et al. 2015; Smith 2005). Given
these trends and parallel framing processes,
print media sources continue to present useful
data for the analysis of cultural framing and
public discourse.
We analyzed newspapers from four Southern states: Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and
North Carolina.3 As table 1 shows, these four
states have witnessed rapid growth in their Latino and foreign-­born populations since 1990
(Migration Policy Institute 2012). Using Access
World News Database and the online archives
of the Jackson Clarion-­Ledger, we randomly sampled news stories per year from 2003 to 2013
from each of the two largest newspapers in
each state. To create these samples, we searched
for articles including the term immigra and retained only those that discussed immigration-­
related issues in the United States. We then
sampled from the eligible stories to retain fifty

3. The eight newspapers are the Jackson Clarion-­Ledger, the Biloxi Sun-­Herald, the Birmingham News, the Mobile
Press-­Register, the Atlanta Journal-­Constitution, the Augusta Chronicle, the Charlotte Observer, and the Raleigh
News and Observer.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

123

Table 1. Foreign-Born Population and Change by State, 1990–2010
1990
Estimate

2000
Estimate

2010
Estimate

1990 to 2010
Percent Change

19,767,316
43,533
173,126
20,383
115,077

31,107,889
87,772
577,273
39,908
430,000

21,419,957
168,596
942,959
61,428
719,137

8.4
287.3
444.7
201.4
524.9

Region
United States
Alabama
Georgia
Mississippi
North Carolina

Source: Migration Policy Institute 2012.

stories per state per year for analysis. We did
so by taking every Nth story, where N equaled
the number of eligible stories that year divided
by fifty.
After compiling the dataset, we used Dedoose, a cloud-­based qualitative content analysis software, to code these stories. All codes
with less than 80 percent intercoder reliability
were dropped from the analysis. The average
for the retained codes was 98 percent agreement. The coding scheme included codes for
racial labels, immigrant country or region of
origin, speaker characteristics, positive and
negative characterizations of immigrants, and
article type and date. In addition to this specified analysis, we used the full universe of
news stories on immigration (approximately
twenty-­three thousand stories) to construct
broader histories of immigration and immigration policy in each state to provide context
for the study. We supplemented this analysis
with content analysis of immigration-­related
stories published in the one of the largest African American newspapers from each state.4
Following the same sampling and coding procedures as for the mainstream newspapers, we
compiled and analyzed a dataset of 476 additional news stories from the African American
newspapers. In what follows, we present results first from the mainstream newspapers,
highlighting trends in reporting of immigrants over time. We follow that discussion
with results from the African American newspapers.

L at i n o R aci a li z at i o n i n
M a i n s t r e a m N e w s pa p e r s

Results reveal consistent patterns in the characterizations of immigrants in mainstream
newspapers in the U.S. South. Table 2 presents
descriptive statistics for the most frequently occurring themes for each code category. Overall,
news stories contained slightly more negative
characterizations of immigrants than positive
ones. Approximately 31 percent of stories contained at least one negative characterization;
29 percent characterized immigrants positively.
The relative balance between positive and negative characterizations may well reflect the
long-­standing journalistic practices of seeking
multiple competing viewpoints to demonstrate
“objectivity” (Schudson 1981; American Press
Association 2017). Our results suggest, however,
that even if journalistic norms encourage reporters to balance both negative and positive
viewpoints on immigrants, the substance of
these viewpoints varies in important ways. Immigration advocates and opponents used distinct portrayals of immigrants that reveal complex and contested debate about the specific
characteristics of immigrants worthy of discussion.
The most common negative claim about immigrants emphasized the perceived criminal
tendencies of noncitizens; economic threat
claims were far less common. Nearly 60 percent
of the negative arguments made about immigrants involved judgments about immigrants’
involvement in criminal activities or their crim-

4. These newspapers include the Jackson Advocate, the Birmingham Times, the Atlanta Daily World, and the
Charlotte Post. Only the Atlanta Daily World is publicly available for our entire period, from 2003 to 2013. We
acknowledge these limitations when discussing our data from these newspapers.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

124

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics for Key Codes
Code

Total (N)

Frequency

Article type
Letter to editor
News reporting
Opinion
Total articles in categorya

320
2,857
1,033
4,208

0.08
0.68
0.25
1.00

Immigrant country or region
Central or South America
Mexico
Vietnam
Total articles in categorya

125
864
73
1,527

0.03
0.21
0.02
0.36

Negative immigrant
Crime
Drain collective resources
Steal jobs
Total articles in categorya

779
367
194

0.19
0.09
0.05

1,323

0.31

Positive immigrant
Hard work
Make collective resources
Racism or discrimination
Total articles in categorya

401
318
582
1,227

0.10
0.08
0.14
0.29

Race
Asian
Black
Latino or Hispanic
Total articles in categorya

104
428
982
1,245

0.02
0.10
0.23
0.30

Speaker
Federal official or politician
State, local elected official
Advocacy, service, nonprofit
Immigrant member of public
Total articles in categorya

384
535
464
365
1,590

0.09
0.13
0.11
0.09
0.38

Source: Authors’ compilation.
Total is the total number of articles with codes for that category. Because an
article might have references to multiple subcodes within a category, totals
are not the sum of all subcodes for the code category.
a

inal predispositions. This argument is exemplified by a 2005 piece in the Raleigh News and
Observer, which reported on crimes involving
local immigrants. The article noted that “Eight
illegal immigrants from Honduras pleaded
guilty Tuesday to federal charges related to a
multistate scheme to steal and resell more than
$2.5 million worth of baby formula and over-­
the-­counter drugs” (Weigl 2005). An article

from the Jackson Clarion-­Ledger in Mississippi
similarly highlighted the fact that the perpetrator of a local crime was an undocumented immigrant: “A police report shows the suspect in
the Wheaton hit-­and-­run is Jaime Martinez, an
illegal immigrant wanted for a homicide in
Mexico, who was driving a borrowed 1997 white
Cadillac” (Apel 2011). Like constructions of African Americans, these news stories portray im-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

125

0.0050

0.25

0.0040

0.20

0.0030

0.15

0.0020

Crime characterizations
Violent crime rate

0.10

0.0010
0.0000

Crime Claims

Violent Crime Rate

Figure 1. Crime Claims by Year and Violent Crime Rate

0.05

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0.00

Source: Authors’ calculations.

migrants as dangerous menaces. Further, media elites opted for language and contextual
associations that depict illegal status as a criminal violation, despite the fact that unauthorized presence in the United States is a civil, not
a criminal, infraction. Although illegality could
be framed as a bureaucratic, legal, or administrative issue, by and large the news media chose
to frame illegality as a form of criminality.
These discussions of crime dwarfed the other
negative stereotypes about immigrants, despite
the fact that crime rates for immigrants and in
immigrant-­heavy areas are consistently lower
than in other areas (Ewing, Martinez, and Rumbaut 2016; Nowrasteh 2015; Rumbaut 2009). Indeed, as figure 1 shows, the prevalence of criminality claims in our data do not reflect any
shifts in the crime rate in these four states under the study period.5 Although crime characterizations rose and fell between 2003 and 2013,
the violent crime rate trend remained stable
from 2003 to 2008 and gradually declined between 2008 and 2013. Moreover, the largest
spike in crime characterizations in 2011 occurred despite a dip in the violent crime rate
the same year.
The crime characterization was so dominant
in our data that the second most frequent negative characterization of immigrants (that they
drain collective resources) constituted only 28
percent of all negative characterizations. A

story from Georgia typified the “drain collective resources” argument when it reported that
residents in the state “want the law to clear the
state of illegal immigrants, who they say are
taking advantage of Georgia’s schools, hospitals and workplaces, draining public funds as
they take jobs that could help the unemployed” (Schneider 2011). Only 15 percent of
articles contained the claim that immigrants
steal jobs from citizens, despite prior scholars
pointing to economic threat as a dominant
anti-­immigrant sentiment (Wilson 2001; Deckard and Browne 2016; Fryberg et al. 2012). A
news story from Raleigh, North Carolina, conveyed this argument in a 2011 story on opposition to immigration. The story quoted Ron
Woodward, president of an North Carolina–
based advocacy group called N.C. Listen, as saying, “If we had half of those people here illegally and those jobs were freed up, that’s
100,000 Americans today that would have a job
that don’t have one . . . That would be a great
improvement” (Barrett 2011). That the steal jobs
argument appears so rarely in the data is surprising given the wealth of academic and public attention to the presumed economic costs
of immigration to American-­born workers
(Newton 2000; Simon and Sikich 2007; Stuesse
2009; Wright, Levy, and Citrin 2015).
Although negative and positive characterizations appeared at similar frequencies in our

5. The trends in crime rates are not driven by a single state. In Alabama, the per capita violent crime rate remained
the same from 2003 to 2013, but in the other three states it declined over the same period.
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�126

Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

sample, positive characterizations and countervailing arguments about immigrants took a
variety of forms. The most common counterpoint offered did not address crime but instead
asserted that immigrants in the region face
racism and discrimination. Indeed, nearly 50
percent of stories that portrayed immigrants
positively made the case that immigrants experience racism or discrimination.6 The second most common positive argument made
about immigrants characterized noncitizens
as hard workers who contribute to the U.S.
economy. These arguments about work ethic
and economic contributions made up approximately 33 percent of all positive arguments
made about immigrants. The third most common positive argument (26 percent) identified
immigrants as contributors to the public good
or as individuals who make collective resources from which others benefit. Around 14
percent of positive claims argued that immigrants have strong family values or that immigrant children are deserving members of society. If immigration opponents attempted to
steer public discourse toward the assumed
criminality of immigrants, supporters focused
instead on racism and discrimination and on
work ethic.
To understand media trends in immigration
coverage, we also examined the countries of
origin noted for those immigrants discussed
in the mainstream newspapers. Country of origin proved an important device for writers in
framing their arguments about immigration.
A full 36 percent of news articles noted immigrants’ country or region of origin. Of these
articles, 57 percent focused on immigrants
from Mexico, an unsurprising trend given the
demographics of the newly arrived noncitizen
population in these states. No other region or
country of origin made up more than 8 percent
of the total. Because public and media discourse about immigration also relies at times
on racialized framing to make arguments about
immigrants, we also coded for the use of racial

labels in immigration-­related news coverage
(Brown 2013). Approximately 30 percent of all
articles used at least one racial descriptor in
their reporting on immigration. The most commonly used racial category was Latino-­Hispanic
(nearly 80 percent of all racial labels applied),
suggesting that Southern media discourse on
immigration is overwhelming centered on Latinos rather than other, in some cases, sizable
populations such as Asian Americans.
To assess news media depictions of Latino
and Mexican immigrants specifically, we examined the co-­occurrence of negative and positive characterization codes with country of
Mexican origin and Latino-­Hispanic race codes
(see figures 2 and 3). First, we examined the
most common negative characterizations
made in articles that discuss Mexican immigrants. Surprisingly, only 15 percent of negative
immigrant characterizations in our data set asserted that Mexicans newcomers steal jobs or
otherwise threaten the economic stability of
nonimmigrants.7 Rather than highlight the
economic effects of immigration, the most
common attacks levied against Mexican immigrants during this period characterized
these newcomers as criminals. Nearly two-­
thirds of all negative characterizations in these
stories labeled Mexican immigrants as perpetrators of crime. These stories took multiple
forms, including news reporting on individual
instances of criminal activity perpetrated by
noncitizens, groups of immigrants implicated
in gang activity and the illegal drug trade, and
undocumented immigrants as inherently criminal due to their unauthorized status. Consider
the following quote from a 2011 Augusta Chronicle story:
U.S. Attorney Ed Tarver said Wednesday that
51-­year-­old Oscar Lazo and 35-­year-­old Eva
Ramos were charged with conspiring to sell
the stolen identities of U.S. citizens and harboring illegal immigrants. Prosecutors also
charged Maurcio Cruz and Manuel Cruz—

6. Racism or discrimination claims appear at similar rates in Alabama, Mississippi, and North Carolina (around
50 to 52 percent of all positive claims and 14.1 percent to 16.6 percent of all stories) but are slightly less common
in Georgia (36 percent of all positive codes and 38 percent of all published stories).
7. By contrast, the most frequently made negative claim in stories about Middle Eastern immigrants involved
terrorism; Southeast Asian immigrants were chided for their lack of English skills.
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

127

Figure 2. Negative Characterizations of Immigrants
0.70

Mexico
Latinos or Hispanics

0.60

Total negative

Proportion

0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10

ts
ris

ob
s

Te
r

ro

St
ea
lj

us
io
re
lig
rly
ve

O

N
ot

as
s

O
ve
rly

im

fe
rt
ile

ila
tin
g

h
is
En
gl
N
o

D

ra

in

co

Cr

im

e

or

cr
im

in
al
s

D
on
't
wo
lle
rk
ct
iv
e
re
so
ur
ce
s

0.00

Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 3. Positive Characterizations of Immigrants
0.60

Mexico
Latinos or Hispanics

Proportion

0.50

Total positive

0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10

sm

s

ci
ra
e
Fa
c

ct

iv

e

re

so
ur

ce

wo
rk
in
g
H
ar
d

s
lu
e
va
ily
Fa
m

En
gl
is
ng
ni
ar

co

lle

Le

M

ak

e

D

es

er

As

vi
ng

si
m

ila

tin

g

ch
ild
re
n

h

0.00

Source: Authors’ calculations.

both citizens of Mexico—with using the stolen identities to get hired at the restaurant.
(Augusta Chronicle 2011)

As is typical in the data, this story not only
reports on law-­breaking activities by Mexican

immigrants, but also stresses the criminal
schemes hatched by those immigrants.
Whereas the most common negative characterization of Mexican immigrants focused on
criminal tendencies and activities, the two
most common positive characterizations em-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�128

Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

phasized immigrants’ hard work and strong
work ethic (44 percent) or claimed that immigrants face racism and discrimination (46 percent).8 Although the aggregate measures show
the hard work and racism claims as equally
prevalent, time-­series analyses reveal that arguments about Mexicans’ work ethic were most
common in the earlier years of our sample, and
racism-­discrimination arguments remain consistently high. In only one year (2006), did the
hard work argument appear more frequently
than the racism or discrimination argument,
suggest that the latter argument about Mexicans was more dominant than the aggregate
numbers reveal.9
These results indicate that, since 2003, immigration discourse in Southern news media
has crystallized around two themes: the criminality of Mexican immigrants and the discriminatory treatment these immigrants face.10 But
are these discussions primarily about race or
primarily about country of origin? To answer
that question, we examined characterizations
of Latinos-­Hispanics in our dataset (see figures
2 and 3). Results reveal similar patterns. Again,
the most common negative characterization in
these articles involved crime and criminality.
More than half (53 percent) of the stories that
discussed Latinos also made assertions about
their supposed criminal tendencies. Virtually

the same proportion of stories with positive
characterizations (47 percent) argued that Latinos face ongoing racism and discrimination.
Notably, news stories were more likely to make
claims of racism and discrimination when discussing Latinos or Hispanics (52 percent) than
when discussing Mexicans specifically (46 percent). Arguments about immigrant work ethic
were also far more common in stories about
Mexicans (44 percent) than in stories about Latinos or Hispanics (34 percent). These linguistic distinctions may signal differences in an
ethnic versus a racial framing, the former intended to construct and denote population
characteristics that are cultural and more positive than the latter (Hattam 2007).11 Despite
these distinctions, these findings suggest a
deep racialization of immigration discourse in
the news media, with media coverage focused
on constructions of Latino criminality and anti-­
Latino racism.
In at least three respects, this media characterization of Latino newcomers parallels the
long-­standing associations between African
Americans and criminality (Alexander 2012;
Mendelberg 2001). First, the emphasis in our
data on Latinos as dangerous outsiders with
inherent criminal tendencies mirrors the long-­
standing characterization of African Americans
as dangerous outsiders, predators, and public

8. These same patterns hold for stories that discussed Central American immigrants. We do not report this data
because references to Central American immigrants were rare in our data set (fewer than two hundred references total or less than 5 percent of all stories).
9. These shifts do not appear to reflect increases in the employment of Latino journalists by newspapers in our
data set. Our story-­by-­story analysis suggests that only 2 percent of all stories in the dataset were written by
Latino journalists, with no increase overtime in the publication of Latino-­authored pieces.
10. Additional analyses suggest these patterns do not reflect significant differences in code distribution across
article types (news reporting, letters to the editor, and opinion pieces). The majority of crime and racism codes
appear in news stories. News stories constituted 68 percent of our total sample. Approximately 64 percent of
racism claims and 72 percent of crime claims occur in news stories. Opinion pieces, which constituted 25 percent of the sample, contained 33 percent of the racism codes and 23 percent of the crime codes. Both codes
are underrepresented in letters to the editor. A breakdown of results by state shows that these trends are not
driven by a single state. Rather, trends appear regionally.
11. Whether there is an analytic distinction between race and ethnicity is heavily debated (see Brown and Jones
2015). Here, we follow panethnicity researchers and colloquial usage in treating national-­origin labels as ethnic,
in contrast to panethnic or racial labels that homogenize diverse national origin groups (Okamoto and Mora
2014). In using the terms racial and ethnic in this fashion, we do not suggest a clear analytical distinction between
the two concepts but rather argue that the two concepts conjure different “associative chains” that produce
distinct discourses in the United States (Hattam 2007)
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

129

Figure 4. Crime and Racism Claims by Year in Mainstream Newspapers
0.25

Proportion

0.20
0.15
0.10
Crime

0.05
0.00

Racism

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Source: Authors’ calculations.

menaces (Russell-­Brown 2008; Alexander 2012).
Second, just as assumptions of black criminality often precede any actual criminal actions
(Yancy 2016), news coverage of Latinos in our
data typically assume criminality on the basis
of a civil violation: unauthorized presence.
Third, media portrayals of African American
and Latino crime are disproportionate to the
actual levels of crime committed by those
groups (Dixon and Linz 2000a).
Our results further suggest that Latino
racialization originates not only from critics
of immigrants who characterize Latinos and
Mexicans as criminals but also from pro-­
immigration forces. Rather than make pro-­
immigrant arguments grounded in economic
or human rights claims (Bloemraad, Silva, and
Voss 2016; Deckard and Browne 2016; Fujiwara
2005; Lawlor 2015), immigration news stories
more often asserted that immigrants, Latinos
and Mexicans in particular, faced widespread
racism and discrimination. The writers, editorial board members, and political figures making these arguments routinely drew parallels
between immigration enforcement efforts and
the South’s historic commitment to racial inequality, Jim Crow, and segregation. For example, in a column focused on immigration, Sid
Salter of the Jackson Clarion-­Ledger dispelled
common myths about Latino immigrants and
argued, “Now that a measure of progress has
been made in race relations between blacks
and whites in Mississippi, it seems some

among us are encouraging new avenues for racism and bigotry, and adding a side order of misplaced nationalism” (Salter 2003). Another article in the same newspaper quoted Bill
Chandler, a Mississippi immigration advocate,
as saying, “[Anti-­L atino racism] is the same
kind of racism that has been perpetuated
against African Americans for years” (Crisp
2010).
Time-­series data show that these two racializing arguments (that of Latino criminality on
one hand and of racial discrimination on the
other) are not independent of each other. As
figure 4 shows, these arguments about racism
and discrimination rise and fall in tandem with
criminality assertions. More specifically, both
Latino criminality and racial discrimination
claims rise and then decline from 2004 to 2006.
Criminalization arguments rise again in 2007,
followed closely by a steep increase of racial
discrimination arguments the following year.
This parallel relationship continues throughout the period of analysis—declining slowly after 2007, rising again between 2010 and 2012,
and declining steeply through to 2013.
Although these claims rise and fall concurrently, our data suggest that different actors
make each argument. News stories highlighting the criminality of Mexicans and Latinos
most commonly quoted state and local government officials, whereas those focused on racism and discrimination relied most often on
reports from representatives from advocacy

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�130

Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

and nonprofit organizations that serve local immigrants. Taken together, these trends suggest
an ongoing and multifaceted cycle of raciali­
zation in which elected and appointed government officials challenge Latino or Mexican
­immigrants as criminal elements, and immigration advocates respond with charges of racism and discrimination. As counterpoints to
racializing claims of Latino immigrant criminality, publishers choose to feed this racialization by citing claims of Latino-­targeted racism
and discrimination. Although these two discourses have different implications and goals,
both are “racial projects” that construct, emphasize, and give primacy to racial distinctions
between Latinos and other groups (Omi and
Winant 1994).
A fr ica n A m e r ic a n N e w s pa p e r s

Do the same patterns present in African American newspapers in the region? To answer this
question, we turn to results from our content
analysis of immigration-­related stories published in four African American newspapers.
Slightly different patterns are evident. First, although positive and negative characterizations
of immigrants appeared at the relatively same
frequency in the mainstream newspapers (31
percent and 29 percent, respectively), African
American newspapers portrayed immigrants
in strikingly more positive terms. African American newspapers published more than twice as
many positive characterizations of immigrants
than negative. Approximately 15 percent of stories in the database contained at least one negative characterization versus 33 percent containing positive characterizations. Although
the balance of positive and negative characterizations differed from the mainstream press,
the content of immigration characterizations
was quite similar.
As in the mainstream press, the most common negative characterization of immigrants
was the argument that immigrants perpetuate
crime. Negative arguments made up only 15
percent of the total stories, but nearly 60 percent of the negative arguments about im­
migrants in African American newspapers
­involved judgments about immigrants’ involvement in criminal activities or their criminal dispositions. For instance, the Birmingham Times

published a story in 2010 that reported on
the criminal dealings of local Mexican immigrants:
A federal grand jury today indicted two undocumented aliens for providing counterfeit
identification documents, announced U.S.
Attorney Joyce White Vance and Bureau of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Resident Agent in Charge Jesse Blakeman. The
indictment filed in U.S. District Court charges
Adalberto de la Cruz-­Angeles, 42, a Mexican
citizen, with two counts of transferring counterfeit Social Security and Permanent Resident cards, once in July and once in November. (Birmingham Times 2010)

Although the African American papers focused on the supposed criminal tendencies and
behaviors of immigrants, they differed from the
mainstream papers in their secondary focus on
immigrants as an economic burden. The claim
that immigrants steal jobs appeared in approximately 39 percent of the articles that negatively
characterized immigrants. Assertions that immigrants drain collective resources appeared
in 21 percent. These articles typically asserted
that immigrants drained public coffers by virtue of their overrepresentation in local prisons,
their mental and physical health issues, and
their reliance on various welfare programs.
These claims echo popular arguments that African Americans see immigrants, particularly
Latinos, as their direct competition for resources and employment (McClain et al. 2006).
Rather than appearing as a dominant narrative
in the African American press, however, these
arguments represented only a small proportion
of the total articles in the newspapers under
study. The economic threat claims were also
concentrated in the early years of our sample,
peaking in 2006 and tapering off by 2008 (see
figure 5).
Despite commonly made claims about conflict between Latinos and African Americans,
our results reveal that positive characterizations of immigrants, Latinos in particular, far
outpaced negative ones in the African American
press. Consider the following excerpt from the
Atlanta Daily World in 2006. The author of the
article included a quote from a nationally re-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

131

Figure 5. Steal Jobs Claims by Year in African American Newspapers
0.35
0.30
Proportion

0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Source: Authors’ calculations.

nowned Latino advocacy group to advocate for
humane immigrant policies: “Undocumented
immigrants contribute about $850 billion more
per year than they cost—a huge net gain for the
United States,” said Brent Wilkes, national executive director of the League of United Latin
American Citzens. “It’s about time that we provide a legal avenue for them to come here in
recognition of their tremendous contributions
to our country” (Curry 2006). The article not
only emphasized the positive economic contributions of immigrants, it also advocated for
policies that would facilitate authorized immigration to the United States.
Although such arguments were common
in African American papers, by far the most
common defense of immigrants offered in the
African American newspapers asserted that immigrants face discrimination or racism. Racism-­
discrimination claims constituted approximately 50 percent of all positive immigrant
characterizations in the mainstream papers and
higher than 70 percent in African American papers. An article from the Jackson Advocate illustrates these claims in its discussion of law enforcement and motorists. Quoting a local
immigrant advocate, the article argued, “The
past reports of ‘driving while black’ have been
supplemented with accounts today of ‘driving
while brown’. . . with the new focus being on
Latino immigrants” (Vern 2010). This quote illustrates not only the common trend in black
papers to argue that immigrants face racism
but also the parallel trend of equating black-­
targeted discrimination with discrimination

targeting Latino immigrants. So common were
references to racism and discrimination in this
dataset that these claims dwarfed other two
most commonly occurring positive characterizations: of immigrants as hard workers (22 percent) and of immigrants as contributing to the
public good (17 percent). As in the mainstream
press, racism and crime claims rise and fall in
tandem over the study period, spiking concurrently in 2006, 2010, and 2013 (see figure 6).
Results from the African American newspapers also reveal distinct trends in the racial labels used in immigration-­related news stories,
particularly when compared to the mainstream
press. Whereas 30 percent of mainstream newspaper articles used at least one racial descriptor
in their coverage of immigration, 67 percent of
articles from African American newspapers
used at least one racial descriptor. The most
commonly used racial category was African
American–black (87 percent), followed by
Latino-­Hispanic (nearly 54 percent of all racial
labels applied versus 80 percent in mainstream
newspapers). These findings suggest that
though immigration coverage focuses on Latinos in both venues, African American newspapers are far more likely than mainstream newspapers to also discuss immigration as it affects
or connects to African American communities.
To assess African American press descriptions of Latino immigrants, we examined the
application of negative and positive characterizations of Latino immigrants. Characterizations of immigrants as criminal were the majority (73 percent) of negative characterizations,

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

132

Figure 6. Racism and Crime Claims by Year in African American Newspapers
0.45

Racism

0.40

Crime

0.35
Proportion

0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Source: Authors’ calculations.

followed distantly by the claim that Latino immigrants drain collective resources (27 percent).
These patterns indicate that the dual racialization of Latinos as criminals and as victims
of racism and discrimination appears in the
African American as well as the mainstream
press. The same time-­series patterns from the
mainstream press also arise in African American newspapers. Like in the mainstream press,
the racialized arguments about Latino criminality and anti-­Latino racism rise and fall in
tandem, again suggesting a pattern in which
immigration foes attack Latinos on the basis
of perceived criminal tendencies and advocates
respond with targeted claims of Latino immigrants facing racism and discrimination. The
key difference between the mainstream and African American newspapers involves the prevalence of each argument and the timing of shifts
in each argument. In the mainstream newspapers, criminality claims occur more frequently
than racism claims in all but one year of the
dataset (2012).12 And, as noted, in the African
American press, racism arguments surpass
criminality arguments in 2008 and remain

more frequent through the end of our analysis
period. Coupled with the fact that the African
American press offered more positive than negative characterizations of immigrants than did
the mainstream press, these trends may evidence broader shifts in black-­Latino relations
in the South over the last decade and a half. As
figure 7 makes clear, over the period of study,
articles about Latinos became less likely to invoke negative characterizations of immigrants
over time. The opposite pattern holds for positive portrayals, trending broadly upward after
2005. These patterns are specific to the African
American newspapers. Mainstream newspaper
articles about Latinos show slight declines in
both positive and negative characterizations of
immigrants during the study period. Time-­
series data indicates that characterizations of
immigrants as criminal, followed by stealing
jobs, diminish over time, and are less prominent than in the mainstream press, suggesting
a shift in public discourse about black-­Latino
relations over the last decade and a half, characterized by increasingly positive characterizations of Latino immigrants as they increased
in size and visibility across the region.13

12. This year marked widespread state and national-­level attention to anti-­immigration laws such as Alabama’s
HB56. Critics of these bills regularly cited them as evidence of racism and discrimination targeted at immigrants
(Brown, Jones, and Dow 2016; Campbell 2016; Mohl 2016).
13. In the last years of our data, crime and racism claims also follow different patterns in the two data sets, both
claims trending upward in the African American press and downward in the mainstream press. Our close read
of the stories from these years does not suggest that these shifts were event driven.
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

133

Figure 7. Co-occurrence of Positive and Negative Claims and Latino or Hispanic by Year in African
American Newspapers
0.35

Negative
Positive

0.30

Proportion

0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Source: Authors’ calculations.

Di s c u s s i o n a n d C o n c lu s i o n

In both the mainstream press and African
American press, results indicate that since 2003
immigration discourse in Southern news media has crystallized around two themes: the
criminality of Latino immigrants and the discriminatory treatment these immigrants face.
Across both sets of newspapers, negative arguments about Latinos focus on their perceived
criminal tendencies rather than characterizing
immigrants as labor market competitors or
economic threats. These claims arise in stories
reporting disproportionately on Latinos under
investigation for possible criminal offenses,
suggesting the prominence of a racial threat
narrative centered on public safety. These same
characterizations also appear in news coverage
about gang activity and in stories claiming that
undocumented Latinos are criminals, by virtue
of nothing more than their mere presence in
the United States. Paralleling this criminality
argument is the equally common claim that Latinos face mounting racism and discrimination
akin to that African Americans face. That these
trends are particularly pronounced for stories
about Latinos and Hispanics (versus stories
about Mexicans) further illustrates the racializing effects of these narratives. These trends
appeared in both the mainstream and the African American press, with one important difference. Pieces in the African American press
were far more positive toward immigrants rel-

ative to the mainstream press. These findings
cast doubt on claims that Latinos in the region
are assimilating into whiteness or occupying
an elevated position in the racial hierarchy.
Our findings indicate key similarities between the racialization of Latinos and that of
African Americans. The criminality claims that
appear in our data are similar to patterns of
media-­driven racialization of African Americans in at least three respects: they emphasize
Latinos as dangerous outsiders, assume inherent criminal tendencies among Latinos, and
overrepresent the proportion of crimes committed by this demographic group (Alexander
2012; Mendelberg 2001; Dixon and Linz 2000a).
The central difference between constructions
of black criminality and of Latino criminality
in our data is the emphasis on Latino illegality
as evidence of criminality. There is, to our
knowledge, no corresponding narrative about
black illegality in the media; however, definitions of criminal and illegal are elastic (Gilroy
2008). Unauthorized presence in the United
States is not a criminal violation but rather an
administrative one. The assumption that unauthorized presence is somehow criminal is a
social construction, and historical immigration
debates in the United States have not always
equated unauthorized presence with criminality (Ngai 2005). A key finding from our study is
that the news media in our sample choose to
portray illegality as reflective of criminality ten-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�134

Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

dencies inherent to Latino immigrants rather
opting to portray illegal presence as an administrative, human rights, or legal-­bureaucratic
issue. This choice is similar to constructions
of black criminality that have long been used
to demonize African Americans as unfit for legal, social, and other forms of citizenship
(James 2010). In our data, the constructions of
Latino illegality as criminality do the same
work.
Our findings not only indicate similarities
in the racialization of African Americans and
Latinos, they also suggest that black political
leaders and cultural elites perceive Latinos as
sharing a common experience of racial discrimination at the hands of whites. The pronounced
emphasis on anti-­Latino discrimination in the
African American press may be coincidental,
but taken alongside new work on black-­Latino
alliances (Brown, Jones, and Dow 2016) and
shifts in black elite public opinion (Williams
and Hannon 2016) it may also reflect a strategic
choice to shore up a sense of shared minority
status between African Americans and Latinos.
Although characterizations of Latinos as victims of discrimination and racism may spur
alliances between minority groups, such claims
may also feed a sense of racial threat among
whites by emphasizing the challenges of Latino
immigration to existing resource distributions.
Regardless of the intent and consequences,
these patterns indicate that media-­driven racialization occurs through both negative characterizations of specific racial groups and
through positive defensive pro-­immigrant
claims. As a counterpoint to the heightened racialization of Latinos as criminals, newspaper
editors and journalists choose to publish stories that defend immigrants as the targets of
racism and discrimination. In the latter instance, racialization may serve as a defensive
resource, in which advocacy efforts draw on
histories of civil rights activism to make their
case. These results suggest that to make sense
of the racially transformative effects of immigration requires a nuanced understanding of
the racialization process. Existing research
largely emphasizes explicit patterns of immigrant racial self-­identification and state ascription. This focus neglects the effects that pro-­
immigration forces, meso-­level organizations,

and implicit racial appeals have on immigrants’
place in and adjustment to U.S. racial hierarchies.
Although our use of the term racialization
refers to discursive constructions, these discourses are meaningful in a racialized social
system, characterized by systemic inequalities
and the primacy of racial hierarchies and divisions (Bonilla-­Silva 1997). As a result, these racialized appeals likely have important consequences for immigrant-­native relations. Efforts
to frame immigrants positively as racialized
minorities and victims of discrimination serve
different purposes and may even serve different purposes for different groups. In the case
of nonwhites, the framing of Latino immigrants as racialized minorities and targets of
discrimination may spur interminority sympathies and intergroup coalitions, particularly in
the U.S. South, where civil rights organizations
and language have unique political visibility.
Collaborative efforts by civil rights organizations, immigrant rights organizations, and African American representatives to pass sanctuary city ordinances in Jackson, Mississippi, and
Birmingham, Alabama, may be evidence of
such effects. Such efforts may also stimulate a
sense of threat among whites (see also Schildkraut and Marotta 2018; Craig and Richeson
2018) and may yield renewed local and state
immigration enforcement.
Because these results are regional rather
than constitutive of a single case, they have significant implications for the context of reception facing new immigrants. In using normative racial codes to situate Latino immigrants
in relation to existing groups (Padín 2005), media not only discursively situate Latinos as most
similar to blacks but also shape the patterns by
which community and local level bureaucrats
will extend access to services and social resources on the one hand, or engage in punitive
behaviors on the other. In establishing the parameters by which Latinos are situated and understood in Southern communities, media discourses may play a significant role in shaping
mobility opportunities for Latinos. A lingering
question from this study involves the discursive
tropes used by the Spanish-­language press to
characterize Latino immigrants in the region.
Given our interest in ascriptive processes of ra-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

cialization, this article focuses only on English-­
language sources. Further, at the time of our
analysis and writing, Spanish-­language media
in the South was unavailable in digitized news
databases. Future analyses of Spanish-­language
media in the region would provide a more detailed analysis of shifts in Latino racial identity,
racialization, and incorporation during this period.
Media racialization of Latinos may affect Latino identities, producing new in-­group meanings, boundaries, and political mobilization. A
sense of proximity to blackness may play a significant role in shoring up a sense of Latino
identity (Jones 2012; Sanchez 2008). This shared
sense of group position can serve as a basis for
political coalitions with long-­term implications
(Kaufmann 2003). Still, our results may reflect
racialization processes particular to the South.
Indeed, the often contradictory conclusions
about the location of Latinos in the U.S. racial
hierarchy may reflect regional differences in
racialization and racial hierarchies. Greater attention to place-­based variation in immigrant
racialization will illuminate the mechanisms
of Latino racialization across contexts.

135

Birmingham Times. 2010. “Undocumented Aliens Indicted for Transferring Counterfeit Documents.”
Birmingham Times. December 1.
Bloemraad, Irene, Fabiana Silva, and Kim Voss.
2016. “Rights, Economics, or Family? Frame
­Resonance, Political Ideology, and the Immigrant
Rights Movement.” Social Forces 94(4): 1647–
74.
Bonilla-­Silva, Eduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism:
Toward a Structural Interpretation.” American
Sociological Review 62(3): 465–80.
———. 2004. “From Bi-­Racial to Tri-­Racial: Towards
a New System of Racial Stratification in the
USA.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 27(6): 931–50.
Brodkin, Karen. 1998. How Jews Became White Folks
and What That Says About Race in America. New
Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Brown, Hana E. 2013. “Race, Legality, and the Social
Policy Consequences of Anti-­Immigrant Mobilization.” American Sociological Review 78(2):
290–314.
Brown, Hana, and Jennifer A. Jones. 2015. “Rethinking Panethnicity and the Race-­Immigration Divide an Ethnoracialization Model of Group Formation.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 1(1):
181–91.
Brown, Hana E., Jennifer A. Jones, and Taylor Dow.

R e fe r e n c e s

2016. “Unity in the Struggle: Immigration and the

Alba, Richard. 2016. “The Likely Persistence of a

South’s Emerging Civil Rights Consensus.” Jour-

White Majority.” The American Prospect, January
11, 2016. Accessed January 19, 2018. http://
prospect.org/article/likely-persistence-white
-majority-0.

nal of Law and Contemporary Problems 79(3):
5–27.
Browne, Irene, Natalie Delia Deckard, and Cassaundra Rodriguez. 2016. “Different Game, Different

Alba, Richard, and Tariqul Islam. 2009. “The Case of

Frame?: Black Counterdiscourses and Depictions

the Disappearing Mexican Americans: An Ethnic-­

of Immigration in Atlanta’s African-­American and

Identity Mystery.” Population Research and Policy

Mainstream Press.” Sociological Quarterly 57(3):

Review 28(2): 109–21.

520–43.

Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass

Browne, Irene, and Mary Odem. 2012. “‘Juan Crow’

Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New

in the Nuevo South: Racialization of Guatemalan

York: New Press.

and Dominican Immigrants in the Atlanta Metro

American Press Association. 2017. “Principles of
Journalism.” Los Angeles, Calif. Accessed January 19, 2018. http://americanpressassociation
.com/principles-of-journalism/.
Apel, Therese. 2011. “Hit-­and-­Run Suspect Still at
Large.” Clarion-­Ledger, November 30.
Augusta Chronicle. 2011. “Across the State.” April 14,
2011.

on Race 9(2): 321–37.
Calavita, Kitty. 2007. “Immigration Law, Race, and
Identity.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3(1): 1–20.
Campbell, Kristina. 2016. “The ‘New Selma’ and the
Old Selma: Arizona, Alabama, and the Immigration Civil Rights Movement in the Twenty-­First

Barrett, Barbara. 2011. “Illegal Immigrant Numbers
Steady.” Raleigh News &amp; Observer, February 2,
2011.

Area.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research

Century.” Journal of American Ethnic History
35(3): 76–81.
Chavez, Leo R. 2008. The Latino Threat: Construct-

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

136

ing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Palo
Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Chavez, Nicole. 2012. “Asylum Requests on Rise

Ewing, Walter, Daniel E. Martinez, and Rubén G.
Rumbaut. 2016. “The Criminalization of Immigration in the United States.” Washington, DC:

Fourfold Jump in Wake of Georgia’s Immigration

American Immigration Council. https://www

Law, but Approval Is No Easy Feat.” Atlanta

.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research

Journal-­Constitution, July 5.
Chiricos, Ted, and Sarah Eschholz. 2002. “The Ra-

/criminalization-immigration-united-states.
Fanon, Frantz. 2004. “The Negro and Psycho-­

cial and Ethnic Typification of Crime and the

Pathology.” In Literary Theory: An Anthology, 2nd

Criminal Typification of Race and Ethnicity in

ed., edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Ox-

­Local Television News.” Journal of Research in
Crime and Delinquency 39(4): 400–420.
Craig, Maureen, and Jennifer A. Richeson. 2018.
“Majority No More? The Influence of Neighbor-

ford: Blackwell Publishing.
FitzGerald, David Scott, and David Cook-­Martín.
2014. Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins
of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas.

hood Racial Diversity and Salient National Popu-

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

lation Changes on Whites’ Perceptions of Racial

Flores, Lisa A. 2003. “Constructing Rhetorical Bor-

Discrimination.” RSF: The Russell Sage Founda-

ders: Peons, Illegal Aliens, and Competing Narra-

tion Journal of the Social Sciences 4(5): 141–57.

tives of Immigration.” Critical Studies in Media

DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.5.07.
Crisp, Elizabeth. 2010. “Miss. Officials Eye Immigration Policy.” Clarion-­Ledger, July 12, 2010.
Curry, George. 2006. “Another Day of Absence.” Atlanta Daily Word, May 4.
Dávila, Arlene M. 2012. Latinos, Inc: The Marketing

Communication 20(4): 362–87.
Fox, Cybelle, and Thomas A. Guglielmo. 2012. “Defining America’s Racial Boundaries: Blacks, Mexicans, and European Immigrants, 1890–1945.”
American Journal of Sociology 118(2): 327–79.
Frank, Reanne, Ilana Redstone Akresh, and Bo Lu.

and Making of a People. Berkeley: University of

2010. “Latino Immigrants and the U.S. Racial Or-

California Press.

der How and Where Do They Fit In?” American

De Genova, Nicholas, and Ana Yolanda Ramos-­
Zayas. 2003. Latino Crossings: Mexicans, Puerto

Sociological Review 75(3): 378–401.
Frey, William H. 2015. “New Racial Segregation

Ricans, and the Politics of Race and Citizenship.

Measures for States and Large Metropolitan Ar-

New York: Routledge.

eas: Analysis of the 2005–­2009 American Com-

Deckard, Natalie Delia, and Irene Browne. 2016.

munity Survey.” Ann Arbor: Michigan Population

“Constructing Citizenship: Framing Unauthorized

Studies Center. Accessed January 19, 2018.

Immigrants in Market Terms.” Citizenship Stud-

http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/census

ies 19(6–7): 664–81.
Dixon, Travis L., and Daniel Linz. 2000a. “Overrepre-

/segregation.html.
Fryberg, Stephanie A., Nicole M. Stephens, Rebecca

sentation and Underrepresentation of African

Covarrubias, Hazel Rose Markus, Erin D. Carter,

Americans and Latinos as Lawbreakers on Tele-

Giselle A. Laiduc, and Ana J. Salido. 2012. “How

vision News.” Journal of Communication 50(2):

the Media Frames the Immigration Debate: The

131–54.

Critical Role of Location and Politics.” Analyses

———. 2000b. “Race and the Misrepresentation of
Victimization on Local Television News.” Communication Research 27(5): 547–73.
Domke, David. 2000. “Strategic Elites, the Press,
and Race Relations.” Journal of Communication
50(1): 115–40.

of Social Issues and Public Policy 12(1): 96–112.
Fujiwara, Lynn. 2005. “Immigrant Rights Are Human
Rights: The Reframing of Immigrant Entitlement
and Welfare.” Social Problems 52(1): 79–101.
Gans, Herbert J. 1999. “The Possibility of a New Racial Hierarchy in the Twenty-­First Century United

Dunaway, Johanna, Regina P. Branton, and Marisa A.

States.” In The Cultural Territories of Race: Black

Abrajano. 2010. “Agenda Setting, Public Opinion,

and White Boundaries, edited by Michèle

and the Issue of Immigration Reform.” Social Sci-

Lamont. Chicago / New York: University of Chi-

ence Quarterly 91(2): 359–78.
Espiritu, Yen Le. 1993. Asian American Panethnicity:

cago Press / Russell Sage Foundation.
———. 2017. “The Census and Right-­Wing Hysteria.”

Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia,

New York Times, May 11. Accessed January 19,

Pa.: Temple University Press.

2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts

137

/opinion/sunday/the-census-and-right-wing

Research Center’s Hispanic Trends Project (blog),

-hysteria.html.

July 26, 2005. Accessed January 19, 2018. http://

Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare:
Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gilroy, Paul. 2008. “The Myth of Black Criminality.”

www.pewhispanic.org/2005/07/26/the-new
-latino-south/.
Krogstad, Jens Manuel. 2015. “Hispanic Population
Reaches Record 55 Million, but Growth Has

In Ethnicity and Crime: A Reader, edited by Basia

Cooled.” Pew Research Center (blog). June 25,

Spalek. New York: McGraw-Hill.

2015. Accessed January 19, 2018. http://www

Golash-­Boza, Tanya. 2006. “Dropping the Hyphen?
Becoming Latino (a)-­American Through Racialized Assimilation.” Social Forces 85(1): 27–55.
Gutiérrez, David G. 1995. Walls and Mirrors: Mexican
Americans, Mexican Immigrants, and the Politics
of Ethnicity. Berkeley: University of California

.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/25/u-s
-hispanic-population-growth-surge-cools/.
Lacayo, Celia Olivia. 2017. “Perpetual Inferiority:
Whites’ Racial Ideology Toward Latinos.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 3(4): 566–79.
Lawlor, Andrea. 2015. “Local and National Accounts
of Immigration Framing in a Cross-­National Per-

Press.
Haney-­Lopez, Ian. 1997. White by Law: The Legal
Construction of Race. New York: New York Uni-

spective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
41(6): 918–41.
LeDuff, Charlie. 2000. “At a Slaughterhouse, Some

versity Press.
Hattam, Victoria. 2007. In the Shadow of Race: Jews,
Latinos, and Immigrant Politics in the United

Things Never Die.” New York Times, June 16.
Lee, Erika. 2002. “The Chinese Exclusion Example:

States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Race, Immigration, and American Gatekeeping,

Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explain-

1882–1924.” Journal of American Ethnic History

ing Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local
Opposition.” American Political Science Review

21(3): 36–62.
Lee, Jennifer, and Frank D. Bean. 2004. “America’s
Changing Color Lines: Immigration, Race/Eth-

104(1): 40–60.
James, Joy. 2010. “‘Campaigns Against “Blackness”’:
Criminality, Incivility, and Election to Executive
Office.” Critical Sociology 36(1): 25–44.
Janssen, Maria Carolina. 2010. “A Framing Analysis
of Weblogs and Online Newspapers.” Master’s
thesis, San Jose State University. Accessed
­January 19, 2018. https://www.scribd.com

nicity, and Multiracial Identification.” Annual Review of Sociology 30(1): 221–42.
———. 2012. The Diversity Paradox: Immigration and
the Color Line in Twenty-­First Century America,
reprint ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lofquist, Daphne, Terry Lugaila, Martin O’Connell,
and Sarah Feliz. 2012. “Households and Families:

/document/192598515/A-Framing-Analysis

2010.” Washington: U.S. Census Bureau. Ac-

-of-Weblogs-and-Online-Newspapers.

cessed January 19, 2018. https://www.census

Jimenez, Tomas. 2009. Replenished Ethnicity: Mexican Americans, Immigration, and Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jones, Jennifer A. 2012. “Blacks May Be Second
Class, but They Can’t Make Them Leave: Mexican Racial Formation and Immigrant Status in

.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf.
Marrow, Helen. 2011. New Destination Dreaming: Immigration, Race, and Legal Status in the Rural
American South. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
———. 2017. “The Difference a Decade of Enforce-

Winston-­Salem.” Latino Studies 10(1): 60–80.

ment Makes: Hispanic Racial Incorporation and

Kaufmann, Karen M. 2003. “Cracks in the Rainbow:

Changing Intergroup Relations in the American

Group Commonality as a Basis for Latino and

South’s Black Belt (2003–16).” In The Politics of

African-­American Political Coalitions.” Political

New Immigrant Destinations: Transatlantic Per-

Research Quarterly 56(2): 199–210.

spectives, edited by Stefanie Chambers, Diana

Kim, Claire Jean. 1999. “The Racial Triangulation of
Asian Americans.” Politics &amp; Society 27(1): 105–
38.

Evans, Anthony M. Messina, and Abigail Fisher
Williamson. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University
Press.

Kochhar, Rakesh, Roberto Suro, and Sonya Tafoya.

Massey, Douglas S. 2008. New Faces in New Places:

2005. “The New Latino South: The Context and

The Changing Geography of American Immigra-

Consequences of Rapid Population Growth.” Pew

tion. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

138

Massey, Douglas S., Jorge Durand, and Nolan J.
Malone. 2003. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
McClain, Paula D., Niambi M. Carter, Victoria M.
DeFrancesco Soto, Monique L. Lyle, Jeffrey D.
Grynaviski, Shayla C. Nunnally, Thomas J.
Scotto, J. Alan Kendrick, Gerald F. Lackey, and
Kendra Davenport Cotton. 2006. “Racial Distancing in a Southern City: Latino Immigrants’
Views of Black Americans.” The Journal of Poli-

Murji, Karim, and John Solomos, eds. 2005. Racialization: Studies in Theory and Practice. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Newton, Lina Y. 2000. “Why Some Latinos Supported Proposition 187: Testing Economic Threat
and Cultural Identity Hypotheses.” Social Science
Quarterly 81(1): 180–93.
Ngai, Mae M. 2005. Impossible Subjects: Illegal
Aliens and the Making of Modern America.
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Nobles, Melissa. 2000. Shades of Citizenship: Race
and the Census in Modern Politics. Stanford, Ca-

tics 68(3): 571–84.
McConnell, Eileen Diaz. 2011. “An ‘Incredible Number of Latinos and Asians’: Media Representa-

lif.: Stanford University Press.
Nowrasteh, Alex. 2015. “Immigration and Crime—

tions of Racial and Ethnic Population Change in

What the Research Says.” Washington, D.C:

Atlanta, Georgia.” Latino Studies 9(2): 177–97.

CATO Institute. Accessed January 19, 2018.

Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign
Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of
Equality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University
Press.

https://www.cato.org/blog/immigration-crime
-what-research-says.
Oboler, Suzanne. 1995. Ethnic Labels, Latino Lives:
Identity and the Politics of (Re) Presentation in

Menjívar, Cecilia. 2016. “Immigrant Criminalization
in Law and the Media Effects on Latino Immigrant Workers’ Identities in Arizona.” American
Behavioral Scientist 60(5–6): 597–616.
Migration Policy Institute. 2012. “2011 American
Community Survey and Census Data on the Foreign Born by State.” State Immigration Data Pro-

the United States. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Okamoto, Dina, and G. Cristina Mora. 2014. “Panethnicity.” Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 219–39.
Omi, Michael, and Howard Winant. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to
the 1990s. New York: Routledge.

files. Washington, D.C.: MPI. Accessed January

O’Neill, Saffron, Hywel T. P. Williams, Tim Kurz,

19, 2018. http://www.migrationinformation.org

Bouke Wiersma, and Maxwell Boykoff. 2015.

/datahub/acscensus.cfm#rankings.

“Dominant Frames in Legacy and Social Media

Mitchell, Amy, and Tom Rosenstiel. 2012. “The State
of the News Media 2012.” Washington, D.C.: Pew
Research Center Project for Excellence in Jour-

Coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.”
Nature Climate Change 5(4): 380–85.
Padín, José Antonio. 2005. “The Normative Mulat-

nalism. Accessed January 19, 2018. http://www

toes: The Press, Latinos, and the Racial Climate

.stateofthemedia.org/2012/overview-4/major

on the Moving Immigration Frontier.” Sociological
Perspectives 48(1): 49–75.

-trends/.
Mohl, Raymond A. 2016. “The Politics of Expulsion:

Passel, Jeffrey S., D’Vera Cohn, and Mark Hugo Lo-

A Short History of Alabama’s Anti-­Immigrant

pez. 2011. “Hispanics Account for More than Half

Law, HB 56.” Journal of American Ethnic History

of Nation’s Growth in Past Decade.” Washington,
D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center.

35(3): 42–67.
Molina, Natalia. 2013. How Race Is Made in America:

Portes, Alejandro, and Rubén G. Rumbaut. 2001.

Immigration, Citizenship, and the Historical Power

Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second

of Racial Scripts. Berkeley: University of Califor-

Generation. Berkeley: University of California
Press.

nia Press.
Montejano, David. 1987. Anglos and Mexicans in the
Making of Texas, 1836–1986. Austin: University of

Ribas, Vanesa. 2015. On the Line: Slaughterhouse
Lives and the Making of the New South. Oakland:
University of California Press.

Texas Press.
Mora, G. Cristina. 2014. Making Hispanics: How Ac-

Rich, Brian L, and Marta Miranda. 2005. “The So-

tivists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a

ciopolitical Dynamics of Mexican Immigration in

New American. Chicago: University of Chicago

Lexington, Kentucky, 1997 to 2002: An Ambiva-

Press.

lent Community Responds.” In New Destinations:
r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�t he r aci a liz at ion of l at ino immigr a n ts
Mexican Immigration in the United States, edited
by Victor Zuniga and Rubén Hernandez Leon.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Rodriguez, Cassaundra. 2018. “Fueling White Injury

cies Across Seven Nations.” International Migration Review 41(4): 956–62.
Singer, Audrey. 2004. “The Rise of New Immigrant
Gateways.” Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institu-

Ideology: Public Officials’ Racial Discourse in

tion. Accessed January 19, 2018. http://www

Support of Arizona Senate Bill 1070.” Sociology

.brookings.edu/research/reports/2004/02

of Race and Ethnicity 4(1): 83–97.
Rodriguez, Clara. 2000. Changing Race: Latinos, the

139

/demographics-singer.
Singer, Audrey, Susan W. Hardwick, and Caroline B.

Census and the History of Ethnicity. New York:

Brettell. 2008. Twenty-­First Century Gateways:

New York University Press.

Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America.

Roediger, David R. 2006. Working Toward Whiteness: How America’s Immigrants Became White:

Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Smiley, Calvin John, and David Fakunle. 2016. “From

The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Sub-

‘Brute’ to ‘Thug’: The Demonization and Crimi-

urbs. New York: Basic Books.

nalization of Unarmed Black Male Victims in

Rumbaut, Rubén G. 2009. “Undocumented Immigration and Rates of Crime and Imprisonment:
Popular Myths and Empirical Realities.” New

America.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 26(3–4): 350–66.
Smith, Jessica E. 2005. “Content Differences Be-

York: Russell Sage Foundation. Accessed January

tween Print and Online Newspapers.” M.A. the-

19, 2018. https://www.russellsage.org/research

sis, University of South Florida. Accessed Janu-

/reports/undocumented-immigration-and-crime.

ary 19, 2018. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu

———. 2011. “Pigments of Our Imagination: The Racialization of the Hispanic-­Latino Category.”

/etd/868/.
Smith, Robert Courtney. 2014. “Black Mexicans,

Washington, D.C.: Migration Information Source.

Conjunctural Ethnicity, and Operating Identities

Accessed January 19, 2018. https://www.migra

Long-­Term Ethnographic Analysis.” American So-

tionpolicy.org/article/pigments-our-imagination
-racialization-hispanic-latino-category.

ciological Review 79(3): 517–48.
Sohoni, Deenesh, and Jennifer Bickham Mendez.

Russell-­Brown, Katheryn. 2008. The Color of Crime,

2014. “Defining Immigrant Newcomers in New

2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.

Destinations: Symbolic Boundaries in Williams-

Salter, Sid. 2003. “Opinion.” Clarion-­Ledger, August

burg, Virginia.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37(3):

20.

496–516.

Sanchez, Gabriel R. 2008. “Latino Group Conscious-

Sommers, Laurie Kay. 1991. “Inventing Latinismo:

ness and Perceptions of Commonality with Afri-

The Creation of ‘Hispanic’ Panethnicity in the

can Americans.” Social Science Quarterly 89(2):

United States.” Journal of American Folklore

428–44.

104(411): 32–53.

Santa Ana, Otto. 2002. Brown Tide Rising: Meta-

Stuesse, Angela. 2009. “Race, Migration, and Labor

phors of Latinos in Contemporary American Pub-

Control: Neoliberal Challenges to Organizing

lic Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Mississippi’s Poultry Workers.” In Latino Immi-

Schildkraut, Deborah J., and Satia A. Marotta. 2018.

grants and the Transformation of the US South,

“Assessing the Political Distinctiveness of White

edited by Mary Odem and Elaine Lacy. Athens:

Millennials: How Race and Generation Shape Racial and Political Attitudes in a Changing Amer-

University of Georgia Press.
Vargas, Nicholas. 2015. “Latina/o Whitening?: Which

ica.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of

Latina/os Self-­Classify as White and Report Be-

the Social Sciences 4(5): 158–87. DOI: 10.7758

ing Perceived as White by Other Americans?” Du

/RSF.2018.4.5.08.

Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Schneider, Craig. 2011. “In Georgia’s Fields, a Growing Anxiety.” Atlanta Journal-­Constitution, June 4.
Schudson, Michael. 1981. Discovering The News: A
Social History of American Newspapers. 2nd ed.
New York: Basic Books.
Simon, Rita J., and Keri W. Sikich. 2007. “Public Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration Poli-

12(1): 119–36.
Vern, Walker. 2010. “Jackson Ordinance Against Ethnic Profiling Draws Strong Support.” Jackson Advocate, August 26.
Weigl, Andrea. 2005. “8 Plead Guilty in Formula
Scheme.” Raleigh News &amp; Observer, January
19.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Immigr ation a nd Ch a nging Iden tities

140

Williams, Kim M. 2016. “Black Political Interests on
Immigrant Rights: Evidence from Black Newspapers, 2000–2013.” Journal of African American
Studies 20(3–4): 248–71.
Williams, Kim M., and Lonnie Hannon. 2016. “Immi-

migration Policy: Testing the Role of Threatened
Group Interests.” Sociological Perspectives 44(4):
485–501.
Wright, Matthew, Morris Levy, and Jack Citrin. 2015.
“Public Attitudes Toward Immigration Policy

grant Rights in a Deep South City: The Effects

Across the Legal/Illegal Divide: The Role of Cat-

of Anti-­Immigrant Legislation on Black Elite

egorical and Attribute-­Based Decision-­Making.”

Opinion in Birmingham, Alabama.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 13(1):
139–57.

Political Behavior 38(1): 229–53.
Yancy, George. 2016. Black Bodies, White Gazes: The
Continuing Significance of Race in America. Lan-

Wilson, Thomas C. 2001. “Americans’ Views on Im-

ham, Md.: Rowman &amp; Littlefield.

r sf: t he russell sage f ou n dat ion jou r na l of t he so ci a l sciences

This content downloaded from
129.210.115.230 on Fri, 04 Mar 2022 02:00:00 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20548">
                <text>The Racialization of Latino Immigrants in New Destinations: Criminality, Ascription, and Countermobilization</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20549">
                <text>Brown, Hana, E</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20550">
                <text>Jones, Jennifer, A</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20551">
                <text>Becker, Andrea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20552">
                <text>Latino Immigration</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20553">
                <text>Race and Equality</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20554">
                <text>This article analyzes patterns in Latino immigrant racialization in the U.S. South. Drawing on a unique dataset of more than 4,200 news stories from the region, we find that Latino immigrants face multifaceted racialization in the news media and that this racialization shares substantive similarities with African American racialization processes. The most dominant negative characterizations of Mexican and Latino immigrants focus on their perceived criminal tendencies. Claims of Latino criminality apply implicitly coded racial language about black criminality to new Latino arrivals. A close qualitative analysis of these trends reveals an ongoing cycle of racialization in which immigration foes challenge Latino or Mexican immigrants as criminal elements and immigration advocates respond with charges of racism and discrimination. Supplemental analyses from four African American newspapers suggest that black elites perceive Latinos as sharing a common experience of racial discrimination at the hands of whites.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20555">
                <text>The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20556">
                <text>2018–8</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20557">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="20558">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20559">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20560">
                <text>https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/rsf.2018.4.5.06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="20561">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
