Physical Disability and Legislation

BlackPantherParty_newspaper_504_page1.jpeg

In April 1977, disability activists nationwide picketed or occupied the Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) offices to fight for the passage of Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. The largest and longest protest took place at the HEW offices in San Francisco, which disability activists occupied for 26 days.

Early perspectives regarding physically disabled individuals harbored repressive attitudes, categorizing them as societal outcasts. People with physical disabilities were commonly labeled as "the crippled" or "the handicapped" in social contexts. The usage of these terms as nouns instead of adjectives underscores the lack of social awareness and inclusivity among both disabled and nondisabled individuals. The 1977 article, Government Policy Toward Handicapped Individuals, delves into the language employed within legislative frameworks to define individuals with disabilities. The simplistic definitions and classifications systematically utilized in legislation reflect careful thought and rational consideration but also the outcome of compromises made during the legislative process.

Pre-existing legislation and societal norms posed significant challenges for individuals with physical disabilities. Accessibility barriers were prevalent across public spaces, transportation, and infrastructure, hindering independent mobility. Moreover, pervasive social stigma and discrimination marginalized disabled individuals, limiting their participation in mainstream activities. Employment opportunities were scant due to workplace discrimination, and education accessibility remained restricted, with many institutions lacking inclusive environments. Legal protections were inadequate, leaving individuals with disabilities facing challenges in advocating for their rights against discrimination.

Several legislative developments aimed to foster a more inclusive society for physically disabled individuals in the United States. One significant stride was the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, which aimed to improve physical accessibility by requiring that federally constructed or leased buildings be accessible to people with disabilities. A pivotal moment came in 1973 with the Rehabilitation Act, particularly Section 504, which prohibited discrimination based on disability in programs receiving federal funding. This section marked a significant advancement in safeguarding the rights of individuals with disabilities, emphasizing equal opportunities in employment and access to programs and services. Furthermore, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1975 mandated a free and appropriate public education for children with disabilities, promoting inclusive education practices and specialized services to meet their needs.

The article discusses the inaugural U.S. White House Conference on Handicapped Individuals convened in Washington D.C. from May 23-27, 1977.

The White House Conference on Handicapped Individuals took place in Washington, D.C., from May 23-27, 1977, signifying the first-ever gathering solely dedicated to addressing the challenges and potential of disabled individuals. With over 3,000 attendees, two-thirds of whom were disabled, alongside parents, researchers, providers, and advocates, this event underscored the emergence of the handicapped community as a distinct social group. The article explores key policy questions related to government action concerning disabled individuals, particularly examining federal legislations' definitions and distinctions, with a focus on the Rehabilitation Act of 1973's Section 504. It critiques prevailing societal attitudes toward the handicapped, parallels issues faced by other marginalized groups, and covers multiple policy areas, including technology, transportation, employment, housing, recreation, and education. Emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts and societal sensitization, it calls for equal rights and opportunities for handicapped individuals, spotlighting the significance of Section 504's regulations and advocating a shift in societal attitudes and policies.